Harewood cash row firm hits back

THE lawyer representing a catering firm locked in a £1m lawsuit with Harewood House has defended its performance.

Simon Myerson, QC, said Dine Catering Ltd did not, under the terms of its operating contract. have to provide client invoices to Harewood House Trading Ltd, the commercial arm of Harewood House Trust – a bitter point of contention between the parties.

Harewood, Yorkshire's most famous stately home which is owned by the Queen's cousin, has claimed during a hearing at Leeds High Court that the 20-year business relationship imploded following a row over alleged underpayments.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Harewood says it is owed 23,000 in unpaid commission from the defendant. The Leeds-based catering firm, run by Daniel Gill, has put in a counter-claim for loss of earnings, which could total as much as 830,000, after its 10-year contract to cater for weddings, parties and other events was terminated.

The arrangement between the two was for Harewood to receive a 15 per cent commission on food and drink sales at a marquee set up in its grounds.

But the explosive issue of the client invoices erupted in 2008 following a grand birthday celebration held for Suzannah Allard for which her husband had flown in the band Westlife.

Harewood was sent a copy of Dine's invoice for the event – the first time it had seen an invoice since the start of the 2007 season – and raised concerns that the amount of income being generated by events was being under-accounted.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

But in his closing speech yesterday Mr Myerson said arguments put forward by the Trust about the lack of invoices could not be held up simply because there was no requirement on the company to provide them.

He said: "The contract provides simply that Dine will pay 15 per cent commission. We need to look carefully at what happened in 2005, 2006 and 2007. The reason for the lack of invoices in 2005 and 2006 is that the parties had not contracted for it.

''What happened in 2005 and 2006 was that the way in which this was contracted was to sit down and reconcile payments with it going both ways.