Government appeals to Supreme Court over Baby P sacking judgment
The Court of Appeal ruled last month that Ms Shoesmith was unfairly sacked, and a leading employment lawyer said she could receive as much as £1m if the decision was not overturned.
A DfE spokesman said: “The Government thinks that it was right in principle for Sharon Shoesmith to be removed from her post as director of children’s services.”
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdHe added: “Our initial application to appeal has been turned down by the Court of Appeal. We have now filed an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.”
The DfE’s statement said: “The Government thinks that it was right in principle for Sharon Shoesmith to be removed from her post as director of children’s services.
“The High Court thought that the decision was taken in a fair way. The Court of Appeal said (on Friday May 27) that they thought it was not sufficiently fair, and was therefore unlawful.
“There are questions of constitutional importance involved in this case, beyond the specific question about whether Ed Balls should have had a further meeting with Sharon Shoesmith before removing her.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“Our initial application to appeal has been turned down by the Court of Appeal.
“We have now filed an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.”
Ms Shoesmith’s career was left in ruins after she was removed from her post in December 2008 by then education secretary Ed Balls and subsequently sacked by Haringey, which said it had lost trust in her.
The axe fell after regulator Ofsted published a damning report in the wake of 17-month-old Peter Connelly’s death, exposing failings in her department.
Lawyers argued that Ms Shoesmith, 58, had been the victim of “a flagrant breach of natural justice” .