Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Leeds Building Society
Sponsored by
Peace of mind and security...
for all your, and your family's, financial needs
 
 
Friday, 9th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Bill Carmichael: French lesson about power



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

WE could learn a lot from the French – and not just in terms of wine, fashion and food.

One area where it seems France has got it right is its reputation for ignoring EU regulations that go against the national interest. Street markets selling livestock alongside un-refrigerated cheeses operate with impunity on the other side of the Cha
nnel. Try that over here and the health and safety Gestapo would have a blue fit.

Another area where the French have emphatically got it right is in power generation. After the oil shocks of 1973, France, with no significant oil or gas reserves of its own, embarked on a massive expansion of nuclear power, completely ignoring the doom-mongerers such
as Greenpeace.

The result has been an unqualified success story. Today, France has 59 nuclear power plants producing 78 per cent of its electricity needs. Electricity is so cheap and abundant that much of it is exported to the UK and Germany, earning the French economy about three billion euros a year.

The cost of electricity to the consumer is among the lowest in Europe and, crucially, France has security of supply. In other words, the Russians could decide to turn off the gas tap and it wouldn't bother the French a jot.

And because nuclear emits no carbon or pollutants, France is also one of the "greenest" countries in the industrialised world.

Contrast this with the situation in the UK. Despite North Sea oil, our energy policy has been allowed to stagnate over the last 40 years. We largely abandoned clean coal technology in favour of a "dash for gas", which has now left us overly reliant on unstable foreign regimes which can put up prices or even cut off supplies on a whim.

Unlike the French, we listened to the alarmist prattling of the eco-warriors, and nuclear power fell out of fashion.

The result is an impending energy crisis. Nuclear provides about 20 per cent of our electricity needs, but the power stations that produce it are ageing and all but one will have to close by 2023.

We are rapidly approaching a vast energy gap between what we are capable of producing and what we need.

Green activists are unperturbed, despite being proved so comprehensively wrong, and now claim renewable energy is the answer to all our problems. But despite huge government subsidies, wind, solar and wave power produce only five per cent of our electricity needs. To suggest that renewables could replace all our nuclear output – as well as coal and gas-fired stations that would need to close to reduce our carbon emissions – is laughable.

To put it into some kind of perspective – you would need 400 wind farms the size of Ovenden Moor to replace a single coal-fired plant such as Drax.

Thankfully, the Government has belatedly realised that urgent action is needed. This week, Business Secretary John Hutton announced a major expansion of nuclear power – not just replacing ageing power plants – and the creation of a £20bn industry providing 100,000 new jobs.

We are lucky enough to observe at close hand the nuclear experiment of the French and it is clear that nuclear power is safe, reliable, cheap and clean.



Class anger

The annual festival of comedy that is the spring teachers' union conferences didn't disappoint this year.

Delegates of the far left NUT would clearly rather be voting on an amendment calling for the overthrow of capitalism by
a workers' revolution – but only during term time.

Instead, they had to settle for a call for strike action over pay.

Bradford teacher Ian Murch warned: "You wouldn't like us when we are angry – and we are getting a bit angry now."

Ooh! He sounds absolutely furious, doesn't he? I reckon someone in the staff room has been using his coffee mug without permission.



The full article contains 648 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 March 2008 8:36 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
Prev
1
Next
1

BenA,

28/03/2008 17:06:17
I’m afraid Bill hasn’t painted an entirely honest picture of nuclear power here. Rather than being the “alarmist prattling of the eco-warriors,” this piece is dreadfully ill-informed doggerel masquerading as accepted fact. Ignoring the claim that nuclear is zero carbon (it’s not – it’s low carbon, but then uranium doesn’t grow on trees) or the inane assertion that it doesn’t produce pollutants (it does, it’s called high-level radioactive waste, it remains lethal for tens of thousands of years, costs the taxpayer billions to store and we still don’t have a solution to properly deal with it) there are a number of points that deserve a second look.

Firstly, clean coal is a misnomer if ever there was one – there is no such thing as “clean” coal. It’s incredibly dirty and is doing an awful lot to wreck the climate, yet we have a Government, the self-styled world leaders on tackling climate change, who are hell-bent on building another 7 coal power stations here in the UK.

Nuclear power currently accounts for around 18% of the UK’s total electricity production. This equates to around 3.6% of our overall energy supply. The real threat to our energy security is interruptions to our oil supply. However, essentially all of Britain’s oil is used for transport and cannot be replaced by nuclear electricity. Much has been made of the threat of becoming over-dependent on imported gas, particularly from Russia. Unfortunately, half of our gas is used directly for domestic space and water heating and cannot be replaced by electricity. More is used for industrial processes, leaving under a third that is used for electricity generation. Much of that third is used to generate electricity at peak times because gas turbines can be easily switched on and off to meet short term spikes in demand. Nuclear power stations must be run continuously. This considerably limits the role nuclear electricity can play in reducing our dependence on gas, from wherever it is imported. As the Governme
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.