Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Redmayne Bentley Stockbrokers Logo
Sponsored by
Yorkshire’s Oldest and Award-Winning Stockbroker
Share Dealing and Investment Management Services
 
 
Wednesday, 7th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Getting tough with fly-tippers



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 August 2008
THE £3m spent cleaning up after fly-tippers is an astonishing figure in any context, but particularly so when contrasted with the paltry number of offenders who are hauled before the courts.
Local authorities are quick to complain that they receive insufficient funding to meet the responsibilities heaped on their shoulders, particularly during the annual tug-of-war with Whitehall over council grants. Yet their long-term failure to confro
nt fly-tipping amounts to a self-inflicted financial wound.

The unscrupulous will continue illegally dumping rubbish as long as there is money to be made from such activities and little risk of being caught.

Securing enough evidence to convict fly-tippers can be an expensive and time-consuming business, a fact that has previously discouraged councils from making the necessary investment. The result is less than one per cent of cases resulting in court action while piles of unsightly rubbish lie in lay-bys and back streets.

Money spent now taking more cases to court, coupled with tough penalties for those found guilty, would eventually produce a deterrent effect. The resulting fall in fly-tipping would release cash to be spent on services or to relieve the inflationary pressure on council tax bills. The experience of authorities, such as Sheffield Council, shows this approach works and more should follow their example.

These alarming figures should also act as a brake on moves to introduce new charges for the collection of domestic waste. The effectiveness of such charges as a way of improving recycling rates is already a matter of debate. On a purely practical level, it would clearly be unwise to impose them before councils could be sure that thoughtless residents will not simply avoid the charge by dumping their waste anywhere they can.

Fly-tipping sullies the countryside, scars neighbourhoods and costs the taxpayer millions of pounds to clear up. It is not a victimless crime and councils should stop treating it as one.



The full article contains 348 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 August 2008 9:47 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Today's Vote

Should food labelling be clearer?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.