Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Redmayne Bentley Stockbrokers Logo
Sponsored by
Yorkshire’s Oldest and Award-Winning Stockbroker
Share Dealing and Investment Management Services
 
 
Thursday, 8th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

The man who wasn't there



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 November 2008
WITHOUT Punch, there was no show. That fact was strikingly apparent at the G20 economic summit this weekend, which turned into the elaborate, mostly useless exercise of attacking global recession by releasing cubic tonnes of political hot air against it. It happened because the event was predictably dominated by one man who wasn't there: the President-elect Barack Obama.
He was cited in the pre and post speeches. He was perpetually talked about in private. He was routinely second-guessed. But the "round table" discussions, with the purpose of bringing consensus and cohesion to the task of tackling the ills of the wor
ld economy, resembled a grand dinner party at which the chief guest politely sent his apologies and left his seat symbolically empty. This is not Mr Obama's fault.

The American constitution purposely left a hiatus between election and inauguration – which, until the 20th Amendment in 1930, actually stretched from November until March – to ensure the counting and re-counting of votes and the orderly transition of power.

What it does, however, is create a void through which the President-in-waiting impotently waits while the occupant of the Oval Office ostensibly has his hands on the levers and pulleys of Government; in this case, that lamest of lame ducks, George W Bush. The G20 leaders had to carry on regardless, but what was said and decided among them requires Mr Obama's seal to give it legitimacy and impetus. The 11-page statement that the meeting produced was full of woolly rhetoric, as if to justify the air tickets, and pitifully bereft on comforting detail. Of course, it made the right promises: a commitment to stimulate growth and reform the financial markets. But nothing in it will lift the spirits of anyone now fearing for their jobs, homes and general financial well being.

Worse still, the discrepancy between the views of the G20 and the reality facing ordinary working men and women is starker than ever. While Gordon Brown talks of the "route map" that the G20 has loftily created – another typically vacuous sound bite – grass roots evidence at home bleakly contradicts him.

Figures from the Local Government Association reveal steepling unemployment across Yorkshire. The CBI forecasts the recession will span the whole of 2009, like a long fiscal winter. And the number of businesses shutting or down-sizing and laying staff off grows daily. Even Mr Brown's tax cuts may not be sufficient to rescue the worst affected.

So, like so many other summits, the latest in Washington will be quickly forgotten; this one more quickly than most, in fact, as Mr Obama pieces together his administration and the lights dim on Mr Bush's unproductive years.

The current edition of Time magazine portrays Mr Obama as FDR on its cover. It is apt only in the sense that when the G20 gathers again in April, the new President will have to help forge a New Deal. But goodness knows what state the world will be in by then.



The full article contains 505 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 November 2008 8:08 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Today's Vote

Should interest rates be cut?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.