Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Charles Stanley Logo
 
 
Tuesday, 9th February 2010

Smoke and mirrors

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 March 2008
THE suggestion that shops might be forced to hide cigarettes under the counter is fuelled by political considerations rather than concern for public health.
Governments were once fearful of attacking a habit enjoyed by millions but in these health-conscious times Ministers have noticed that the public mood has changed.

The irony is that it was MPs who voted for the most significant restriction on toba
cco – a complete smoking ban in public places – when the Government had proposed a less ambitious plan. Nevertheless, Ministers have clearly come to believe there are votes to be earned by targeting smokers in any way they can.

Public opinion has moved because the dangers to health posed by smoking are now so well-documented that only a fringe minority dispute them. The public smoking ban has been generally accepted, even by many smokers, because it helps to protect people from the risks associated with passive smoking. Raising the age people can buy tobacco to 18 was considered a helpful way to cut under-age smoking. Health warnings on tobacco products give the consumer information about the risks they are taking.

New restrictions on the way tobacco products are displayed might allow Ministers to claim that they are going even further to promote
healthy living but would serve no useful purpose. They would merely introduce a mild inconvenience for adults who, despite the many warnings, choose to smoke and the shopkeepers who legitimately sell them.

Public Health Minister Dawn Primarolo argues children need to know smoking is bad but large sums are already spent on anti-smoking campaigns and shopkeepers can be prosecuted for selling tobacco to under-18s.

Smoking remains a legal activity that earns large sums of money for the Exchequer. On that basis, there seems little justification in giving the act of purchasing tobacco an air of impropriety.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 March 2008 11:27 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
Prev
1
Next
1

John Yorky Boy,

Bradford 26/03/2008 12:38:38
If MPs believe there are votes to be earned by targeting smokers in any way they can they need to get real. A large proportion of smokers, and a non too insignificant minority of non-smokers aren't happy with Labour's smoking ban. Indeed my local MP initially supported the ban, but more recently was in favour of exemptions for certain premises - I think he'd realised what would win votes!

Also the article mentions the "risks associated with passive smoking", however it doesn't mention there have been no scientific studies carried out that resulted in any proven risk of harm from passive smoking.
2

timbone,

26/03/2008 13:05:31
"[we] managed to ban smoking from enclosed public places while believing that the weight of evidence on passive smoking was "insubstantial". That is a recent comment from Professor Julian Le Grand, Government advisor from 'Health England'. "The results do not support a causal relation between environmental tobacco smoke and tobacco related mortality, although they do not rule out a small effect". Part of the conclusion from possibly the largest most extensive study ever done by Enstrom and Kabat. "HSE cannot produce epidemiological evidence to link levels of exposure to second hand smoke to the raised risk of contacting specific diseases". The conclusion of the Health and Safety Executive study presented to the Government prior to the ban. Professor Sir Richard Doll was the first scientist to publish research linking (primary) smoking with lung cancer. However, three years ago, Prof. Doll stated: "The effect of other people smoking in my presence is so small it doesn't worry me." There are many more. The question is, is this ban really about passive smoking?, or have the public, and possibly some of the MPs' been hoodwinked.
3

Roger, Newcastle,

26/03/2008 15:01:07
"Professor Sir Richard Doll was the first scientist to publish research linking (primary) smoking with lung cancer. However, three years ago, Prof. Doll stated: "The effect of other people smoking in my presence is so small it doesn't worry me."

He actually said this on Desert Island Discs round about 2002, when he was 90. He was asked whether he made a fuss if people lit up in front of him, and his comment was in the context of being very old and, in effect, too old to harm.

In the same interview he also said that "THE PROMOTION OF SMOKING IS EVIL", but the pro-smoking lobby never quote that bit. I wonder why.
4

TheTerminator,

UK 26/03/2008 15:11:08
The new restrictions are all part of an ASH Scotland 2007 Manifesto under the heading " Next steps for the Scottish Parliament " produced before the last Scottish elections in may 2007. It would seem that this group of Anti-Smoking zealots are now exporting their bigotry to England.If this proposal to make cigarette sales " under-the-counter" is made law the next idea in ASH Scotlands Manifesto will no doubt raise it's ugly head " limiting the times at which tobacco can be sold and the number of places that can sell it". The smoking ban is a complete failure, it has not reduced levels of smoking, it is lining the pockets of the pharmaceutical companies, it has created a new jobsworth industry, it has destroyed the hospitality sector and finally it has caused division and hatred in sections of the community that never existed before. Get rid of the MP's who supported the ban, the councillors who suport it, the EHO's who enforce it and most of all put ASH and ASH Scotland into the dustbin of history.
5

english charlie,

suffolk 26/03/2008 16:34:56
Only 25% of the electorate voted for this Labour Government. At least 25% of the electorate are smokers. If most, if not all smokers voted for the same party, that party would win the next General Election.
6

english charlie,

suffolk 26/03/2008 17:26:44
Pubs should hide smokers inside the pubs out of the view of young kids walking past. Those young kids should not be allowed to see adults getting satisfaction from smoking.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 

Features

Today's Vote

Do you still support the Afghanistan war?
Yes
No


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.