Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Redmayne Bentley Stockbrokers Logo
Sponsored by
Yorkshire’s Oldest and Award-Winning Stockbroker
Share Dealing and Investment Management Services
 
 
Thursday, 8th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Fruit and veg can bend the rules



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 November 2008
IT was announced this week that from next summer the European Union will cease to outlaw non-uniform vegetables and fruit. The question which followed is: "but will we eat wonky veg"?

I'm sorry, but we seem to have lost our collective marbles.

Once a cucumber is sliced, who is to know it never met the criteria for the "maximum arc" as defined by the European Union under Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1677/88. Passed on June 15
1988, it lays down that Class I cucumbers must "be reasonably well shaped and practically straight (maximum height of the arc: 10 mm per 10 cm of the length of cucumber)".

When a carrot has been sliced and cooked, who cares, when it appears on your plate, that in the raw state the carrot diverged from Commission Regulation No 730/1999 of April 7 1999. This ordered that a carrot must be "not forked, free from secondary roots"?

It drove commercial growers mad trying to match-up these bureaucratic categories laid down in an office with the reality of what they dug out of their fields.

It was quite possible for their produce to be below Class I but too good for Class II and therefore, on the market, to exist in a kind of legal limbo. The British enforcer – the Rural Payments Agency – could and did stop traders selling produce that was the wrong size, in some cases prosecuting offenders.

The net result was financial loss and prodigious waste. At one point, an estimated 20 per cent of British onion production was wasted because it did not meet the standards.

But that was mostly in the past. The scrapping of the EU laws will be cheered, but their passing will not make a such huge difference today. That's because the vegetable market has become more specialised in recent times to cater for a more choosy customer.

So a potato for example, whose size once might have caused it to fall foul of EU rules, is now marketed so that its particular shape becomes a selling point, not a drawback. So big or small, they find separate niches on the shelves as baking potatoes, mashing potatoes, sauteeing potatoes or whatever.

Richard Snowden, who farms at Wharfedale Grange, at Harewood in West Yorkshire, will certainly be glad to see the back of the restrictive laws which he says were "complete stupidity".

But more pressing for him is a new battle with the same EU bureaucrats. This time it's over what he's allowed to put on his land and crops. He says restrictions being placed on commercial growers like himself will put them at a huge disadvantage against imports from non-EU growers.

"Some years ago the less safe chemicals were removed and rightly so," says Richard. "The new rules are basically for chemicals we use for weed control and fungicides. I cannot afford to have teams of people doing the job they do in the fields. The rules seems to have come out of the same bureaucratic black hole as the one that gave us rules for straight cucumbers and forked carrots."

In the meantime, he has other matters to divert him from his fields. Richard is a painter, and his work is on show at his farm next week, Friday to Sunday, in an event called Christmas Crackers. Call 07745 970039 or see www.richardsnowden.co.uk.



The full article contains 572 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 November 2008 10:10 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.