Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Redmayne Bentley Stockbrokers Logo
Sponsored by
Yorkshire’s Oldest and Award-Winning Stockbroker
Share Dealing and Investment Management Services
 
 
Friday, 10th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

High time Yorkshire tackled thorny issue of Headingley trouble-makers



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
21 July 2008
FOLLOWING a fortnight in which their reputation has been dragged through the mud by their abject elimination from the Twenty20 Cup, Yorkshire County Cricket Club and their embattled chief executive Stewart Regan urgently needed a good Test match.
They have not had it.

Instead, the second Test between England and South Africa has been marred by familiar problems in the notorious West Stand, difficulties getting in and out of car parks, prolonged queues and sundry irritations.

Headingley
Carnegie, far from being the fine and swanky stadium Regan seems to think it is, remains the worst in England to watch Test cricket.

It is high time Regan and Yorkshire got a hold of the West Stand situation in particular.

Year after year it is a disgrace – not as bad as it once was, admittedly, but still a place where no-one in their right mind would pay to watch Test cricket in peace.

In the interests of research, I gave it a go on Saturday afternoon and gave up after about 20 minutes.

The atmosphere reminded me of chucking out time in Leeds city centre, while the thought of taking a young child into that stand would be entirely out of the question.

Such behaviour is not confined to Headingley, of course. Similar difficulties crop up at Edgbaston and it is very much a reflection of society in general, but we have now reached the stage where the attitude towards the West Stand seems to be:, "Oh well, that's just the way it is, so we'd better put up with it". Rubbish.

Considering Regan blithely dismissed crowd disturbances at Yorkshire's Twenty20 home games in 2007 as nothing different to what you might encounter on a Saturday night out, we can presumably expect to see more sitting on hands in years to come.

But if Regan will not get a grip (and it remains to be seen whether he can ever recover from the shambles of the Azeem Rafiq affair, which has cost the club's players the chance of a place in the £2.5m Champions League), then Yorkshire should appoint someone who can.

The solution to the problem is actually straightforward – if people misbehave, they should be immediately ejected. Full stop.

That is what it says in the ground regulations and, until Yorkshire work harder to enforce the regulations and change the culture, the culture will never change.

And if ejections result in a few hundred empty seats, so be it. That is a price worth paying to eliminate the troublesome minority who come along solely to get plastered.

At around 5.00pm on Saturday, I found myself talking to a Yorkshire official who told me only one person had been ejected that day from the West Stand until that point. I found that incredible, considering the dreadful behaviour I had witnessed first hand.

I actually saw the ejection referred to at close quarters. A young, drunken man tried to run on to the field before being halted by stewards, and it took four police officers to bring him under control while halfwits in the crowd laughed and cheered at this tragic spectacle.

But if only one person is being ejected during several hours of mayhem, small wonder these problems continue ad nauseum.

One steward told me there had been 62 ejections on the opening day but, judging by the pitiful standards of behaviour on view, even that figure was nowhere near high enough.

Instead, foul and abusive language remains prevalent; indeed, I am continually flabbergasted as to what one must do to get ejected from a ground for swearing, but if Headingley's standards are so low, small wonder behaviour is so abysmal.

Towards the end of Saturday's play, looking at the West Stand from the comfort of the press box, I trained my binoculars on that part of the stand near the rugby field in which most of the trouble seems to be confined.

Incredibly, only a handful of spectators were actually watching the cricket; the rest, most of them in a shambolic state of alcoholic excess, were involved in activities more akin to a boozy night out.

Some spectators, of course, behave themselves properly. Some come along in fancy dress and add to the colour and carnival of the Test match occasion. That's fine.

But some have no interest whatsoever in watching the cricket, only in drinking themselves into a state of oblivion, and Yorkshire need to work harder to drive out the trouble-makers.

It is not just the general inconvenience caused by bad behaviour that mars the occasion, it is the damage caused to the cricket itself.

Play during the second Test has been halted by a handful of idiots who have run onto the pitch and by beach balls and bits of paper being thrown on the field.

Sadly, it appears some things never change.

Yorkshire and Headingley Carnegie deserve the Test match they get – one habitually affected by loutish behaviour.





The full article contains 835 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 July 2008 8:58 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Nigel B,

Northallerton 21/07/2008 14:01:20
Agree entirely with this article. Along with my 2 sons aged 17 and 14, I had the misfortune to spend Friday in the West Stand at Headingley. As cricket nuts who watch cricket all over the country, we were shocked at the loutish behaviour and dreadful language emanating from large areas of the stand. Steward "bating" was non-stop and worsened as the day wore on. The poor stewards seated on the pitch perimeter were pelted by objects of ever increasing size. They did remarkably well to refrain from reacting and did an excellent job when an idiot ran onto the playing area. Eventually it became almost impossible to concentrate on the game; cricket fans, especially young children and the elderly were intimidated and many left before the end of the days play. What can be done about this kind of behaviour ? after listening to the Chairman of YCCC interviewed by CMJ on TMS, I can only conclude that it is time for a new Chairman or perhaps to take next years Ashes Test away from Headingley and give it to Trent Bridge, Old Trafford or Chester Le Street !!!
2

Haxbytyke,

York 21/07/2008 22:24:27
Although a Yorkshire member I have not attended a Headingley test since Boycott scored his 100th century because of this behaviour. Unfortunately it is not just at Headingley, but also appears at Sunday league matches at Scarborough. Twice, in recent years I have written to Yorkshire CCC to express my concerns, and have been assured that any trouble or bad behaviour will be addressed immediately. However, as we all know, the stewards are too busy telling off youngsters who are sitting on the boundary edge to sort out any trouble. The answer is easy, do not open the public bars. Will it happen? I think we all know the answer to that one!
3

Andy-M,

Leeds 22/07/2008 13:17:42
What a bitter and spiteful article from somebody who is clearly missing their more youthful days and also the ability to enjoy themself.
Whilst I don't condone the pitch invasions, one of the good things about going to a cricket match (test matches in particular) is that you have the ability to enjoy yourself and get a little merry in the company of likeminded people.

I was in the West Stand on Saturday from the beginning and thoroughly enjoyed myself, along with everybody sat around me.

May I suggest a trip to Call Lane in the early hours of a Saturday/Sunday morning - I'm sure your opinion of the 'loutish behaviour' will soon change...
4

Matt K ,

London 22/07/2008 14:02:25
As an Australian guest watching cricket for the first time outside of London or Australia, I thought the behaviour of the crowd on the West Stand was infinitely more enjoyable than the display of cricket. The crowd on Saturday was boisterous without being offensive, singing and chanting with good humour and minimal swearing.
I was also near the gentleman who stepped over the fence and he hardly charged onto the field, he entered (somewhat groggy) to retrieve his shoe that the overly officious stewards would not return. As the crowd correctly pointed out - ‘ALL HE WANTED WAS HIS SHOE!’ Of course the stewards should stop him, however I thought the ‘Green Team’ were a little heavy handed. A pity the English players didn’t demonstrate equal steel on the day. Conversely, congratulations to the ‘Orange Team’ of stewards who joked along with the crowd.
Hopefully I can return next year to watch the Ashes.
5

Sicarr,

Harrogate 22/07/2008 14:39:18
Well, its no wonder cricket it still viewed as a stuffy old mans sport, suited only for those in their blazers and members ties eating cucumber sandwiches!

Attendances have been in the doldrums (in comparison to other major sports AND other test playing nations) for years and its mainly because of the arrogant, snooty nosed old farts like you!

What is your problem with people having fun? The players love the West stand, its one of their favourite parts of playing at Headingley. Sorry lads, but its not you boring old gits that the players look forward to.

I was there on Friday. The players loved the banter (Alma was taking his fair shair of stick and received it very well), the police saw NOTHING wrong and without the West stand, the ground would have been like a funeral parlour!

Great idea to ban everyone who is having a good time. Hopefully then you can achieve your aim of running down test cricket attendances to 30 per day!

PS. If you need evidence that Cricket is about the fans, why was Twenty20 invented and given the format it was? TO ENTERTAIN THE CROWD!!
6

Sicarr,

Harrogate 22/07/2008 14:42:43
And by the way, to the author of the article - if you couldn't manage to watch more than twenty minutes of the test in the west stand then you must have a serious attention span deficit!
I managed to watch a full days play there on Friday.
7

The Romans!!,

Kent 23/07/2008 09:13:17
We were in the west stand on saturday, we were in complete fancy dress and we all had a brilliant day ... we drank, sang songs and were quite merry but that was it!! You will always have some people that want to get a little more drunk than others and try causing trouble, that is society today, nothing to do with the cricket, providing they are dealt with let the others enjoy themselves!!

As for the guy who "ran onto the pitch" I think the reporter needs new glasses, he did not run anywhere and all he was trying to do was retrieve his shoe that some halfwit had thrown onto the pitch, hardly reasoning for the Steward to rugby tackle him to the ground along with another 4 wannabee heroes and some police, that was what annoyed the crowd if anything, all the Steward had to do was give him his shoe back, he wouldn't have gone on the pitch then!! From then on the crowd gave the Stewards a little verbal abuse and you are deeming it unnacceptable ... You'll also find that there were 18 people ejected on Friday and 21 on Saturday, hardly masses considering a full capacity of 17000 on each day!! Even KP joined in at one point with the mobile phone!!

I'd like to add that had the cricket been a little more interesting the crowd may not have been so bored!

As for the other people talking about children and other people not wanting to be in that area its quite simple, don't buy tickets in the West Stand!! I would never take my children in there, doesn't mean they couldn't go in another stand!!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.