Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Redmayne Bentley Stockbrokers Logo
Sponsored by
Yorkshire’s Oldest and Award-Winning Stockbroker
Share Dealing and Investment Management Services
 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Price rise fears over EC ruling



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
26 September 2008
THE price of some British vegetables, including potatoes, would have to double to keep farmers in business if proposed new rules on pesticide control take effect, a leading economist has said this week.

Sean Rickard of Cranfield University, Bedfordshire, a former chief economist for the National Farmers' Union and a member of government advisory bodies on agriculture, said loss of production would add £1 a kilo to the costs of potatoes and cabbages.


Reduced wheat yields would lead to 9p on a standard loaf, 3p on a litre of milk and 40p on a kilo of pork, and many farmers would be forced out of business.

Mr Rickard, who runs the Master of Business Administration programme for the Cranfield School of Management, near Bedford, was hired by agro-chemicals company Bayer, to report on the cost implications of the kind of yield losses already predicted.

Ministers from the Department for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs are appalled at the possible consequences, but the European Commission is trying to persuade everyone else that they will not be too bad.

The Yorkshire Post was among the first to report on the impact assessments written by the UK's biggest agricultural consultancy, Agricultural Development and Advisory Service (ADAS), which used to be part of Defra, and the government's own Pesticides Safety Directorate. (PSD).

The PSD named the substances which might be taken out of circulation in a report for Defra. Then ADAS estimated the effect on crops in a report commissioned by the pesticides manufacturers.

Mr Rickard's report is based on their work and EC officials in London say that means worst-case scenarios, based on "unrealistic" assumptions.

But James Clarke, who worked on the ADAS report, said the worst was still possible, because there was so much uncertainty over how the proposed new rules would work. Until the EC cleared up the confusion, all predictions were a matter of opinion to some extent.

Go to http://tinyurl.com/4g8eta for the full version of Mr Rickard's report.





The full article contains 341 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 September 2008 10:21 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.