Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Redmayne Bentley Stockbrokers Logo
Sponsored by
Yorkshire’s Oldest and Award-Winning Stockbroker
Share Dealing and Investment Management Services
 
 
Friday, 9th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Why we love to see movie bad boys fighting back



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 September 2008
Everybody loves a comeback kid. It seems to happen every year. In the last 12 months we have witnessed the wholesale career resurrection of Robert Downey Jr.



Now it's the turn of Mickey Rourke, one-time '80s heartthrob-turned-pugilist who recklessly threw away his hard-won fame and acclaim on bad behaviour and worse movies.

It's a peculiar phenomenon. The American movie industry likes its stars to be malleable types who turn up to premieres, smile for the cameras and give good talk. It doesn't matter if they are shovelling cocaine up their noses, just as long as it doesn't affect business.

Downey fell into the latter trap. There came a time when Downey couldn't get a job – but he could get arrested, and frequently did.

His once-promising career was in freefall, and the man who played Chaplin looked like crashing and burning with devastating force. Suddenly, he's back, and stronger than ever. What's more, Hollywood has welcomed him back with open arms.

Cue Mickey Rourke. After years in the wilderness he's returned with a performance of raw intensity as Randy 'The Ram' Robinson in Darren Aronofsky's The Wrestler. The word is that it's the best thing he's ever done – praise indeed when one thinks of films like Angel Heart. Rourke has been ripe for rediscovery for half a dozen years. He embraced the bad boy persona with a vengeance.

He went spectacularly off the rails, became unemployable and was the epitome of the Hollywood pariah. Some whispered that he'd even gone slightly nuts.

Maybe he did. One oft-repeated story had Rourke pelting from a press conference on the beach at Cannes to do some praying in the sand.

No-one amongst the watching journalists and TV crews was particularly impressed, and Rourke bore the brunt of their collective ire. When he hit the skids, no-one cared too much. He ditched movies for the ring, becoming a professional boxer. The work dried up, the offers stopped coming and suddenly Mickey Rourke, the golden boy and prospective megastar, found himself collecting a meagre weekly allowance from his manager.

He underwent plastic surgery on his roughly handsome features, which were battered in a series of fights. He paid to see a shrink three times a week. He bade farewell to friends, colleagues and even a harem of girlfriends. His constant companions were his dogs. He lived in a hotel room.

It was a long way to fall and painful to witness. Rourke landed with a crunch.

Then came the fightback. Rourke sought to rebuild a career he had cast aside. There were small roles and support in Once Upon a Time in Mexico, Man on Fire, Domino and Sin City. No-one could quite believe the turnaround – the ultimate bad boy was behaving himself.

Now there is The Wrestler. The reviews are raves, and everyone is talking about Mickey Rourke.

He's survived and, at 52, can look forward to a second chance at the big time.

All sins forgiven. Who, I wonder, might be next…?

The full article contains 528 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 September 2008 12:50 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.