Emily Bronte portrait goes under the hammer
An oil painting believed to be of author Emily Bronte which will be the latest item relating to one of the literary sisters to go under the hammer.
AN oil painting believed to be of author Emily Bronte will be the latest item relating to one of the literary sisters to go under the hammer.
The piece is being sold by Northamptonshire firm JP Humbert Auctioneers after the sale of another painting of the reclusive writer for £23,836 in December.
It also follows the sale of an unpublished manuscript by sibling Charlotte Bronte at auction to a Paris museum for a record value of nearly £700,000 last month.
The hitherto unseen painting of Emily Bronte measures 33cm by 24cm and depicts a pensive-looking Victorian woman, auctioneer Jonathan Humbert said.
Annotated Emily Jane Bronte, it has more unclear writing, possibly an artist’s name or title, he said.
The painting was handed to the auctioneers by a private owner after seeing publicity around the previous portrait, and is expected to fetch at least £3,000.
“I am amazed that this second painting has turned up on our doorstep,” Mr Humbert said.
“One unknown portrait of Emily Bronte is luck enough but two in two months is quite remarkable.
“This painting is definitely mid-19th century and has been attributed to Miss Bronte by the artist at the time of painting.”
The portrait is set to go on sale, unreserved, on February 23 at JP Humbert’s sale room in Towcester, Northants, with a provisional estimate of £3,000-4,000.
Last month a tiny manuscript of The Young Men’s Magazine, Number 2, by Charlotte Bronte, sold for £690,850 at Sotheby’s.
It was bought by Paris museum La Musie des Lettres et Manuscrits, scuppering attempts by the Bronte Society to return it to the Bronte Parsonage Museum at the writer’s home in Haworth, West Yorkshire.
Written when Bronte was 14, the tale is set in Glass Town, the earliest fictional world created by the Bronte siblings.
Sotheby’s estimated it would sell for between £200,000 and £300,000, but the manuscript sold for more than double the top estimate, setting new auction records for a manuscript by Charlotte Bronte and for a literary work by any of the Bronte sisters.
In a less high-profile sale on the same day, a portrait of sibling Emily Bronte sold for twice its estimate - fetching £23,836 - at JP Humbert’s.
Email to a friend
Print this page- Leeds lose Ward to Palace: Is there anyone they can afford now?
- Sheffield Wednesday leaving it late to hijack Leeds United over Ward
- As Snodgrass dithers over Leeds, Warnock throws a lifeline
- Ball is in Leeds United’s court over contract - Snodgrass
- Police turning blind eye to Asian voter fraud, says MP
Looking for...
Featured advertisers
Jobs
Search for a job
Motors
Search for a car
Property
Search for a house
Weather for Yorkshire
Saturday 26 May 2012
Today
Sunny
Temperature: 8 C to 21 C
Wind Speed: 17 mph
Wind direction: East
Tomorrow
Sunny
Temperature: 9 C to 22 C
Wind Speed: 13 mph
Wind direction: East
Comments
There are 1 comments to this article
Page 1 of 1
grahamwatson
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 11:26 PMThis portrait is a fake. It's not of Emily Bronte. Given its style, I think it would also be reasonable to doubt that it was painted before the 1960s. For one thing it doesn't match descriptions of Emily Bronte, or resemble the authenticated portraits of her. Ellen Nussey, a friend of the Bronte family, described Emily having dark blue-grey eyes. This blueish colour can be seen in the group portrait painted by her brother and now in the National Portrait Gallery. The woman in this painting clearly has brown eyes. Secondly, it has too close a resemblance to the George Richmond drawing of Charlotte Bronte to be co-incidental. The posture and clothes are identical, and the facial representation is very similar. And Charlotte is (correctly) drawn with brown eyes, which might be how the woman in this picture came to have them. (Do a Google image search using the words Richmond Charlotte Bronte to see what I mean). It looks to me that the artist has used the Richmond drawing of Charlotte as a base. Additionally, given that Emily Bronte has been a figure of public interest since the mid-19th century the likelihood of an authentic portrait of her turning up (with her name on it no less!) that has somehow escaped being documented by Emily Bronte's inheritors (her sister Charlotte, their father Patrick, then Charlotte's widower) is so slight as to be practically non-existent. Let the potential buyer of this be warned!
Page 1 of 1
Your view
Please sign in to be able to comment on this story.