Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Redmayne Bentley Stockbrokers Logo
Sponsored by
Yorkshire’s Oldest and Award-Winning Stockbroker
Share Dealing and Investment Management Services
 
 
Saturday, 4th July 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Angry naturists blast beach warning signs



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
06 May 2008
NATURISTS are seeking support for an online petition in an attempt to make a Yorkshire council take down "misleading" signs on an East Coast beach.

Some people who use Fraisthorpe beach, near Bridlington, say East Riding Council has gone beyond its powers with "scary" signs which suggest nude sunbathers may face prosecution.

They say recent legislation confirms that nudity is not illegal in an established location and the beach has been used by naturists for decades.

The online petition adds: "The councils (sic) are relying on the fear of prosecution to impose their will. Councils which put up signs like this should be forced to take them down, be fined and have to apologise publicly."

Spokesman Max Pratt, of Fraisthorpe United Naturists, one of whose members launched the petition, said: "The sign says any person committing an act of indecency will be liable to prosecution, but being naked is not indecent. They are mixing the two up.

"If there are people breaking the law that's an issue of law enforcement, but you can't persecute a minority group for the actions of other people."

The regional representative for British Naturism, John Wymark-Hoar, said the signs were a "total slur" on naturists. He added: "The signs imply that naturism is indecency and we are guilty of acts of indecency.

"They wouldn't do that to any other minority group of the East Riding.

"We attended a meeting with Humberside Police last year and they confirmed that they wouldn't be taking any action against naturists but they would always reserve the right to investigate reports of criminal activity – which could come from ourselves."

However, those people who simply want to enjoy the sun naked have been tarred with the same brush as exhibitionists who come to the beach for sex. Despite the council's actions, Fraisthorpe is still advertised on "dogging" websites as a naturist's beach, offering "some action", but tellingly warning: "Do not offend the genuine naturists."

Farmer Robin Jackson, whose family has been running a beachside car park since before the Second World War, said the signs should stay.

He said: "If the naturists would keep it to simple naturism they would have still continued but they didn't and it turned out that it became a no-go area.

"That's why the designated area was taken away and it wants to remain that way. Putting up the signs (means) we have families back again and the whole area has come from a no-go area to a place which people can enjoy. If they want the designated area back there will be a great uproar."

Ward councillor Jane Evison accused naturists of "mischief-making" and added: "I don't think there's any doubt about what the signs are and what they are saying.

"Fraisthorpe is not a designated beach and as such the council is within its rights to say it is not a designated beach," she said.

"As a ward councillor my residents tell me they don't want it to be a naturist beach."

The beach, three miles south of Bridlington, was a recognised nudist area until the former East Yorkshire Borough Council decided to remove the designation.


The full article contains 532 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 May 2008 1:08 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Malcolm Boura,

British Naturism 06/05/2008 21:14:52
Ms Ellison is jumping to conclusions. A few of her residents may have told her that they don't like naturists but has she asked them all? Has she bothered to actually find out in a systematic and unbiased way what people really think? We have and the results are absolutely conclusive. It is only a tiny minority of people who have any problem with naturism. Nearly half think that we are sensible and 8 out of 10 that we are harmless. They obviously understand the difference between naturism and criminality.

It is not naturists who are causing the problems and the refusal to distinguish between naturists and criminals just causes the problems to continue. If the council were to show such prejudice against a racial or religious group then they would very quickly find themselves in court. Unfortunately we do not yet have that level of protection but Ms Ellison and her friends are providing us with useful ammunition. Prejudice is quite simply not acceptable.

Nearly everywhere else around the English coast naturists, councils and the public manage to coexist. The only thing different about Fraisthorpe is the council.

The council has consistently failed to follow good practice as recommended by central government, consistently refused to even discuss the issues with the recognised national organisation and consistently failed to solve the problems. As long as the council continues with negative and counter-productive policies then the problems will continue.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.