Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Redmayne Bentley Stockbrokers Logo
Sponsored by
Yorkshire’s Oldest and Award-Winning Stockbroker
Share Dealing and Investment Management Services
 
 
Saturday, 10th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Council slammed over pay rises



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
20 November 2008
THE timing of massive pay rises at a Yorkshire council was as "subtle as a train crash", councillors were told yesterday.
The decision to award directors at East Riding Council up to £12,000, backdated to last November, has sparked outrage.

Yesterday it was the turn of Goole businessman Peter Finch to express the feelings of many taxpayers when he asked councillors g
athered in Beverley why when low-paid workers were suffering pay restraints, senior managers were getting huge increases.

The extra cash which directors will see in next month's pay packets will see chief executive Nigel Pearson getting £9,000 on top of his £153,000 salary, while four other directors will get rises of almost £12,000, taking salaries up from £111,000.

Another director and 21 heads of service will get £5,000 to £6,000, costing the taxpayer £190,000.

Councillor Stephen Sloan, one of two members of a staff terms and conditions committee to vote against the rises, said he was not convinced by arguments that they had to keep up with other authorities to recruit and retain the best candidates.

The council's recent top rating by the Audit Commission was as down as much to the workforce – stuck on 2.5 per cent – as the managers getting 11 per cent.

Coun Sloan contrasted reports suggesting as many as 175,000 people were expected to lose their jobs in Yorkshire and the Humber over the next year with the rises.

He said: "An issue of this nature is always going to arouse public interest. Had the review taken place two or three years ago it wouldn't have aroused the same furore. The timing is as subtle as a train crash."

Councillor Bob Tress said in his 30 years of public service he'd never come across "so many angry people".

However council leader Stephen Parnaby insisted that the salaries were the going rate.

Average salaries of chief executives stands at £158,000; Hull pays its chief executive in the region of £190,000, Cornwall's top officer was on £200,000.

The nine new unitary authorities would need hundreds of senior staff.

He said: "Do we say 'well, we are going to buck the trend'? We want senior managers to come and work in the East Riding, we pay 25 per cent less.

"Let's get real – we have to attract the right sort of people; we have to retain the right sort of people. You can't expect people to be paid less than the market rate."

Coun Sloan moved an amendment to the minutes of the meeting which made the changes to say they were accepted "with regret" – but he and other Lib Dem and Labour members were outvoted by Tory councillors.

Members of local watchdog East Yorkshire Eye who had demonstrated outside County Hall were left far from satisfied.

Martin Layton said the decision to backdate the claims was an insult to those who paid council tax. "All the arguments that Stephen Parnaby put forward could be put forward by every single organisation in the country but they have to manage within their budgets."

And protester Richard Bryon said: "In one breath they are going to freeze council tax – then they are giving these above-inflation rises".





The full article contains 557 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 November 2008 10:11 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Claudius,

Hedon 20/11/2008 12:40:16
East Riding residents appalled by this travesty might be interested to know that on 7 November, I submitted the following letter to Mr Graham Stuart, Member of Parliament for Beverley & Holderness (and my MP).

Mr Stuart's reply reached me on 19 November (the day that the meeting reported above was held) with a letter of his own. In it, he defends and supports the salary increases. Today, a local newspaper reounts how he is calling for tax cuts for local businesses. The question is this: if businesses are given tax cuts, who (alone) is left to pay for the salary increases these senior officers are to receive, as approved by Mr Stuart and the Conservative Council?
2

Claudius,

Hedon 20/11/2008 12:41:28
As an East Riding of Yorkshire Council taxpayer, I feel compelled to comment.

Seven or eight years ago, my involvement in local politics (then non-existent) began when the press made an almost identical announcement. Readers were informed that the then ERYC Chief Executive had been awarded a salary increase of more than thirty per cent. Other senior officers were to receive similar salary hikes.

Given that this came at a time of cuts to services and substantial increases to local tax, the decision was met with disbelief, outrage and determined opposition. In fact, public opposition was so strong that it forced an emergency meeting of the full council at which elected members expected to debate these proposed increases and to vote for or against them.

On the relevant day, County Hall’s public gallery was (as they say) “packed to the rafters”. But minutes after the meeting had begun, a local government lawyer representing the council officers threatened councillors with the possibility of legal action, taken against them personally if they voted to reject the salary increases - or even if they continued with the discussion. Naturally, this intimidation had its desired effect: the debate ended before it began. I recall how at the time, a local journalist wrote that ERYC councillors were “done up like kippers”.

Déjà vu: it seems we are returned to the same position. When our elected members attend the relevant council meeting in reasonable expectation of debating and voting on this proposal, will they be allowed to do so - or are kippers once again on the menu?

When ERYC Council Leader, Stephen Parnaby gained overall control of County Hall, he sought to allay the concerns of elected members by assuring them that any proposal could be “called in” to be decided finally by the full council. We have seen that this does not happen. And if I understand matters correctly, a legal fiction will be used to prevent the full council from voting in this case also.
3

Claudius,

Hedon 20/11/2008 12:43:00
(.....continued)

It seems that before these salary proposals can be put to the full council, they must first be referred back to the committee that was responsible for approving them in the first place. But of course, the majority of councillors, as obedient Conservatives, will follow instructions and oppose such a referral. In this way, the full council will be denied an opportunity to vote on the specific issue. Frankly, East Riding residents deserve better from their local authority than self-indulgent, puerile games that make the election of ninety per cent of the councillors in County Hall a complete irrelevance.

Councillor Parnaby and his colleagues defend these enormous salary increases with the same claptrap they invoked previously; namely, that senior officers must be paid the “going rate” lest they seek employment elsewhere.

But the answer to this nonsense is that they set the going rate. When Nigel Pearson’s predecessor received his salary increase, this officer actually became the highest paid local authority chief executive in the entire country. But only briefly, of course - for within a few weeks, another local authority was seeking to justify a pay increase which placed its most senior officer on an even higher salary. Thus, A is leapfrogged by B; then, C leapfrogs B. Next of course, A must have another increase to catch up with B and C. And so it continues - an inexorable, upward spiral of mere avarice.

This situation needs to be brought to an end - and if the price is that the officers involved elect to seek alternative employment, then so be it and good luck to them.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.