Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Redmayne Bentley Stockbrokers Logo
Sponsored by
Yorkshire’s Oldest and Award-Winning Stockbroker
Share Dealing and Investment Management Services
 
 
Thursday, 28th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Curbs on second homes rejected by Government



View Video
Download Video

Video

You live in a picturesque seaside - so what happens when the second-homers move in? Watch and find out.
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 July 2008
THE Government has rejected calls to try out restricting numbers of second homes in countryside beauty spots.
The Department for Communities and Local Government said it has "yet to be convinced" that restrictions would be workable or make property more affordable after a long-awaited report suggested trialling a scheme to force people to apply for planning permission when they turn a property into a second home or holiday let in some areas.

Liberal Democrat MP Matthew Taylor, whom Gordon Brown asked to look into rural affordable housing, said that, although there was "no clear evidence" high numbers of second homes pushed up prices, large numbers of properties standing empty for much of the year could threaten the future of shops and pubs and undermine communities.

"Although there are issues of practicality, there is a case to be made for controlling (through the planning system) further conversion of full-time homes into second homes and holiday lets only in those places where there is identifiable impact on the sustainability of the host community," his report concluded.

"This issue will not go away because it raises genuine concerns in those communities most affected.

"To move forward at all, a trial in one or more of the communities affected would be the necessary next step. The place to do this might be in one of the National Parks."

Growing numbers of second homes, often bought by city dwellers, in some country areas have provoked controversy as villages become increasingly deserted for long spells and lifeline services such as post offices and pubs are put under threat as business dwindles.

Mr Taylor – whose report called for a shake-up of planning and affordable housing policy to revive rural communities – said concern about the impact of second homes had been raised repeatedly during his review, although the properties only account for one per cent of England's housing stock.

Concerns about the impact of second homes prompted a ban to be introduced in 2005 in the Yorkshire Dales national park on new properties being sold to outsiders.

But Mr Taylor's proposals to trial the new powers were played down by the Government which said there were more innovative ways of providing affordable housing without limiting the rights of second home owners.

Paul Rouse, who used to run the Second Home Owners' Association, said work still needed to be done to find out how many rural homes were needed.


The full article contains 423 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 July 2008 9:39 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Claudius,

Hedon 24/07/2008 11:14:51
What else could a good socialist administration like New Labour do but reject so iniquitous a proposal?
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.