Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Charles Stanley Logo
 
 
Tuesday, 9th February 2010

Final closedown for £675,000 'Big Telly' amid fears of public spending squeeze

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 November 2009
HULL's controversial "Big Telly" is to be switched off for good.
Civic leaders say they cannot afford the £200,000 cost of the massive city centre screen in the face of the impending squeeze on public spending.

It will now be taken down and put up for sale to try to recoup some of Hull Council's costs.

The t
elevision, which dominates Queen Victoria Square, has been controversial from the start.

Detractors said it never lived up to grandiose claims made by the Labour administration who spent £675,000 bringing it to the city. But many are wondering now whether it will be missed during big events like the Olympics and the World Cup.

Council leader Carl Minns said they had looked at moving the Big Screen to a less conspicuos location but the move would cost another £100,000. He added: "In terms of the ongoing maintenance and insurance costs, it isn't value for money."

The original deal was signed off by just two Labour councillors without cross-party discussion in a move that sparked a political storm. One was former council leader Colin Inglis, who said: "Only in Hull could this ever have been such a big issue. I despair sometimes of the petty politicking by small-minded councillors which has got us into this position."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 November 2009 8:02 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Claudius,

Hedon 28/11/2009 11:12:15
"Only in Hull could this ever have been such a big issue. I despair sometimes of the petty politicking by small-minded councillors which has got us into this position."

Given his own history as a councillor, only a feeble-minded hypocrite like Inglis could produce such a remark and hope to escape with it.

A few weeks ago, this fellow had a letter published in the local rag complaining of a lack of consultation from the present administration.

Because of his lack of consultation, the people of Hull found themselves paying for his bloody silly television. Of course we know why Mr Inglis chose not to consult: had he done so, he would have been told in no uncertain terms what to do with the screen.

And notice, Inglis doesn't address the lie put about by the local authority during his time as council leader that the BBC would subsidise it.

But then, that's more or less the way this arrogant little nobody operated over everything.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.