Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Redmayne Bentley Stockbrokers Logo
Sponsored by
Yorkshire’s Oldest and Award-Winning Stockbroker
Share Dealing and Investment Management Services
 
 
Saturday, 4th July 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Government backs down over Yorks eco-town



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 November 2008
THE Government has given up in its bid to find a site for a controversial new eco-town in Yorkshire amid fierce opposition from council leaders.
Instead, Ministers have agreed councils in the Leeds City Region area can develop plans for environmentally-friendly housing developments on the edge of existing towns or cities.

It ends months of deadlock between central and local government in the region. Former housing minister Caroline Flint had demanded councils find a suitable site only for local authorities to carry out a study and conclude there was nowhere suitable.

In a statement today, the Department for Communities and Local Government said: "We have agreed to a proposal from the local authorities in the Leeds City Region to develop an urban eco-community in the area that meets the sustainable standards of an eco-town, but is not be a distinct settlement.

"There are three potential locations for this eco-community under consideration, in the Aire Valley, North West York, and the Bradford-Shipley corridor. This will now be taken forward with local authorities outside the eco-towns programme, and Leeds City Region has therefore been removed from the 12-strong eco-towns shortlist."

Meanwhile the bid for a 5,000-home eco-town at Rossington in South Yorkshire has been scored a Grade B in the latest assessment, meaning it may be a suitable project if it meets specific planning and design objectives.

A fresh round of consultation on the standards required in the eco-town developments begins today before a shortlist of up to ten is drawn up from the 12 remaining bids.

The Government wants to build five eco-towns by 2016 and another five by 2020.

Housing Minister Margaret Beckett said: "The threat of climate change is a challenge we must tackle at every level and housing is no exception. Developing a greener approach to our housing need is crucial and eco-towns are a vital part of this programme. As well as providing additional homes they represent an opportunity to trial the kind of green technology that I hope will soon become commonplace in all new development. The Government must be at the forefront of the green agenda and that is why today's proposed standards mean eco-towns face the UK's toughest ever green standards for new development.

"I believe it is vital we get the locations for these eco-towns right, and the shortlist has been refined to reflect the results of the most detailed assessment to date on these potential locations. But I do not expect all of these locations to go forward – the eco-town standards are tough and I think some of these shortlisted schemes could struggle to meet them. Everyone has the opportunity to have their say on these proposals, both now and in the future when planning applications are received."

What do you think? Register or sign in to have your say on this story.

The full article contains 506 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 November 2008 10:43 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.