Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Redmayne Bentley Stockbrokers Logo
Sponsored by
Yorkshire’s Oldest and Award-Winning Stockbroker
Share Dealing and Investment Management Services
 
 
Friday, 21st November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Ministers urged to rethink biofuels policy



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 March 2008
Ministers are under pressure to rethink a move to force motorists to use biofuels as the Government's top environment adviser fears it could increase emissions.
Professor Robert Watson called for the initiative – designed to cut greenhouse gas emissions – to be postponed while the impact of biofuels is reviewed.

He was joined by environmental and planning organisations which signed an open letter to Transport Secretary Ruth Kelly.

From next month, biofuels are to be used to partially power every vehicle in the country.

Under the Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation (RTFO), they will have to comprise at least 2.5 per cent of fuel at the pumps.

But Prof Watson cautions there are still doubts about biofuels.

The Department for the Environment's chief scientist said: "Many people still believe that some biofuels are indeed still sustainable from an environmental standpoint. I think we need to check that.

"It would obviously be totally insane if we had a policy to try and reduce greenhouse gas emissions through the use of biofuels that's actually leading to an increase in the greenhouse gases from biofuels."

Biofuels, mainly ethanol and diesel made from plants, have been promoted as an alternative to the use of liquid fuels in transport which account for about a quarter of global greenhouse emissions.

Asked about the start date for the RTFO, Prof Watson added: "I would suggest that we would indeed wait until the review is completed."

His comments came as groups including Oxfam, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace wrote to Ms Kelly saying "there is a very real risk that the RTFO will make climate change worse, not better".

Doug Parr, chief scientific adviser of Greenpeace, said: "From next month British motorists will be forced to pump biofuels into their tanks with no way of knowing if the so-called green fuels they're using are actually worse for the climate than regular fossil fuels."

Abigail Bunker, agriculture policy officer of the RSPB, said: "Biofuels threaten untold damage to unique wildlife habitats across the world.

"Their production is already causing the destruction of rainforest, peatlands and grasslands and the release of huge amounts of carbon stored by trees and soil.

"Thousands of people last week urged the Government to shelve its plans to force us to buy more biofuel. Ministers must heed those pleas not bulldoze through more biofuel use."

Kenneth Richter, biofuels campaigner at Friends of the Earth, said it would be irresponsible to proceed with the policy when experts were still "scratching their heads".

A Department for Transport spokesman said the RTFO would encourage the use of sustainable biofuels.

"Biofuels have the potential to help reduce the impact of transport on the environment but we have always been clear about the need to ensure that they are sustainable," the spokesman said. "The RTFO has at its heart a detailed sustainability reporting mechanism – going further than any other country – which will create a strong incentive for transport fuel suppliers to source sustainable biofuels.

"In addition, we recently announced a study into the wider impacts of biofuel production to help inform the development of both the UK and EU's policies in this area."


The full article contains 550 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 March 2008 2:13 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
Prev
1
Next
1

david hill,

huddersfield 28/03/2008 21:24:50
Biofuels (and carbon capture) are a 'catastrophe' for future humankind. The decisions being taken by governments around the world in the quest for sustainability are a catastrophe for humankind in the long-term. Two of these decisions at the forefront of news are biofuels, and carbon capture and storage.

Biofuels -- the fuel revolution that will supposedly help us:
(1) Growing crops in the United States for biofuels requires around the same energy input for fertilisers and processing the crops as that saved by replacing petrol on the forecourt (Biofuels - A solution worse than the problem, Daily Telegraph).
(2) By harvesting the peat bogs for biofuels, we release 30 times more carbon dioxide than will be recouped by burning the biofuel produced (Prof. Jack Riley, University of Nottingham).
(3) Growing biofuels takes a lot of land and huge amounts of water -- neither of which the world has to spare.
(4) China and India risk famine if they proceed with their biofuels plans, because they don't have enough water to grow both fuel and food (International Water Management Institute).
(5) Biofuels are killing forests and leading to more global warming, besides taking land away from food crops (Global Forest Coalition).
(6) The diversion of land meant for food crops to agrofuel production is a "crime against humanity" (Jean Ziegler, UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food).

Carbon Capture -- putting off today what others will have to solve tomorrow:

(1) Carbon sequestration and storage (under our oceans and land) is an untried method of locking up carbon dioxide forever, but there is not a 100 per cent assurance that it will not escape. Possible escape routes include earthquakes, land shifts, terrorism (holding the world to ransom) or human disasters/accidents.
(2) Sequestration and storage of carbon dioxide is not a solution, but a problem that humankind will have to face in the future -- one that might eventually threaten the existence of human life its
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.