Shamed but not named: Sadistic Edlington brothers get indefinite anonymity to protect their human rights

A JUDGE has granted indefinite anonymity to two brothers who were aged 10 and 11 when they tortured two young boys in South Yorkshire, in a case which shocked Britain.
The two brothers who tortured two young boys, as they appeared in court. Drawing: Priscilla ColemanThe two brothers who tortured two young boys, as they appeared in court. Drawing: Priscilla Coleman
The two brothers who tortured two young boys, as they appeared in court. Drawing: Priscilla Coleman

The pair were sentenced to an indeterminate period in custody, with a minimum of five years, following the horrific incident in 2009 which became known as the Edlington Case, after the former pit village near Doncaster where it happened.

A court order made at the time granted them anonymity until they were both 18.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad
Edlington Recreation ground where the two brothers started their brutal attack on two boysEdlington Recreation ground where the two brothers started their brutal attack on two boys
Edlington Recreation ground where the two brothers started their brutal attack on two boys

As the younger of the two brothers approached his 18th birthday, lawyers acting for the pair sought a lifelong anonymity order, claiming that identifying them would breach various sections of the Human Rights Act.

And today High Court judge Sir Geoffrey Vos ruled that they should remain anonymous.

The barrister representing the two brothers had asked the judge to grant anonymity.

The wooded area near Edlington, where an attack on two children took place in April 2009.The wooded area near Edlington, where an attack on two children took place in April 2009.
The wooded area near Edlington, where an attack on two children took place in April 2009.
Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Phillippa Kaufmann QC was instructed by staff from the Office of the Official Solicitor, which helps vulnerable people involved in court cases.

The order bars journalists from revealing the brothers’ original names or their new identities.

Sir Geoffrey said he was satisfied that the anonymity order was in the public interest.

He said he would outline his reasoning in writing at a later date.

More shortly