Hillsborough police chief’s wife tells of ‘ordeal’

Former chief superintendent David Duckenfield (front) .

Former chief superintendent David Duckenfield (front) .

1
Have your say

THE WIFE of the match commander on the day of the Hillsborough disaster has said that she and her husband are also going through a “terrible” ordeal.

Although former chief superintendent David Duckenfield declined to make a comment following the conclusion of the inquests, his wife Ann told a reporter how their lives have been affected.

Mrs Duckenfield accompanied her husband to the inquests held in Warrington as he gave evidence, before the jury concluded that the 96 Liverpool fans had been unlawfully killed.

She was approached at their home in Dorset by an ITV Granada reporter who asked how their lives had been since April 15 1989 when the disaster unfolded during Liverpool’s cup tie against Nottingham Forest at Sheffield Wednesday’s ground.

She said: “Terrible. It’s been terrible, but we just have to get on with it, if it carries on like this we’ve just got to get on with it, but it’s terrible for us too.”

When asked about the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) investigation into police conduct over Hillsborough, Mrs Duckenfield replied: ‘’Yes ... we can’t say anything about ... we can’t talk about that. We don’t know what’s going to happen.’’

Mr Duckenfield could face criminal proceedings over the deaths and has already been interviewed under criminal caution.

The jurors at the inquests were told by the coroner they could reach the conclusion of unlawful killing only if they were satisfied that Mr Duckenfield owed a duty of care to those who died, that he was in breach of that duty of care, that his breach caused the deaths and that it amounted to “gross negligence”.

On Twitter Chris Long said: “Ohhh poor Mr & Mrs Duckenfield. It’s been terrible for them, but they’ve just been getting on with it. #myheartbleeds #knaffoff.”

Jane Rigby-Dobson added: “Ann and David Duckenfield you will find no sympathy or forgiveness from me.”

Earlier Mr Duckenfield had been approached by a BBC news crew at San Francisco airport and asked for his “reaction to things”. Mr Duckenfield said: “At the present time, due to the ongoing criminal inquiries, I’m afraid that I am unable to comment, and I hope you’ll excuse me.”

Asked if he had a message for the families, he said: “I’ve said what I’ve got to say at the moment.”

He added: “When I was at the coroner’s court in Warrington I gave a message and I have nothing more to say. I hope you’ll excuse me.”

When asked at the inquests if his negligence caused the disaster, he said he would not use that word and instead classed it as an “oversight”.

Mr Duckenfield landed at Heathrow with his wife on a flight from San Francisco and was met by a taxi driver holding up a sign for “Mr and Mrs Salisbury”, according to the Daily Mirror.

The newspaper said Mr Duckenfield refused to answer questions over whether he is expecting to be prosecuted.

According to the Mirror, he said: “At the Hillsborough inquest I expressed my profound sympathies for the deceased and their families.

“I apologised for the mistakes that I had made but I am sure you understand that it would not be appropriate for me to say anything more while the Independent Police Complaints Commission is investigating.”

The Hillsborough disaster unfolded on April 15 1989 as thousands of fans were crushed at Sheffield Wednesday’s ground.

Mr Duckenfield gave the order at 2.52pm to open exit Gate C in Leppings Lane, allowing around 2,000 fans to flood into the already packed central pens behind the goal.

A range of individuals and organisations could face charges over Hillsborough.

Possible offences include gross negligence manslaughter, perverting the course of justice, perjury and misconduct in a public office, according to former director of public prosecutions Ken Macdonald.

No decisions are expected before the end of the year.

Back to the top of the page