Sponsored by
The modern Royal Mail fails to deliver its former glories
From: Dr Henry Woods, Westfield Road, Tockwith, York.
IN 1913, my late father-in-law, then an undergraduate at Oxford who wrote to his mother almost every day, could guarantee that if he posted his letter by 10pm at Oxford Railway station, it would be on his mother's breakfast tray in Harley Street, London, by 8am the following morning.
One would imagine that, with all the advances in the technologies of sorting and moving the mail since then, maintaining the standard of service in 1913 to present day customers would be easy.
The reality is the present shambles in which first class mail is not guaranteed to reach recipients the following day, we draw a veil over second class mail, deliveries and collections are reduced or abandoned on Sundays, and local post offices are closed.
The consultations about closure look increasingly like smoke screens to fool the "peasants" into thinking their views are being listened to,
and the outcomes of the exercise affected.
Curiously, the Royal Mail was a success when the Postmaster General was a Minister of the Crown and answerable to Parliament. Now whoever is responsible to the House of Commons is so far below the parapet that I don't know who it is. Can the citizens not lobby their MP from now until the General Election to harass the Government into appointing someone who will put the customer first and get sufficient grip to make the Royal Mail the success it was in 1913?
From: Judith Donovan, chair, Postwatch Northern England.
RECENT correspondence (Yorkshire Post, July 31) has been critical of the current post office closure programme and the role of Postwatch in it.
Customers must understand it is not Postwatch's job to try to prevent all post office closures. The current closure programme is happening because the Government has decided that Post Office Limited cannot go on losing 4m a week, so 2,500 branches must close by the end of 2008. Neither Postwatch, nor the Government, has any veto to stop specific closures; it is Post Office Limited that decides which branches must close.
What Postwatch does is try to ensure that the right closures occur for the right reasons. To date, we have succeeded nationally in getting over 300 closure proposals withdrawn from the programme.
The real issue is not whether any post office closures occur or not. It's about making sure that they happen in a planned and sensible manner to give customers reasonable access to services still and the network the best chance of making itself sustainable long-term.
From: Robert Bottamley, Thorn Road, Hedon, East Yorkshire.
ALASTAIR Cook's letter (Yorkshire Post, August 5) joined others in deploring how the Post Office continually reduces the range and quality
of its services.
Mr Cook's conclusion was that the Post Office might as well abandon its policy of "suicide by a thousand cuts" (along with any pretence of providing a public service) and simply close down with immediate effect.
Your correspondent referred to possible benefits that might be derived from taking this course of action but neglected to mention one particular, important benefit: namely, that it would no longer be necessary to provide the organisation's silent, unaccountable and obscenely overpaid chief executive with his salary.
From: David Wright, Little Lane, Easingwold, North Yorkshire.
MURRAY Naylor (Yorkshire Post, July 31) and your other correspondents who have rightly condemned the Post Office closures have all missed the real culprit behind this disgraceful situation.
Guess who? The EU and Directive 97/67/EC (Privatisation of Postal Services) issued on December 15, 1997. Instructions from Brussels to Foreign Secretary David Miliband (dated November 28, 2007) leaves no doubt that the EU is in control of our postal services.
For decades until the late 1990s, the Royal Mail was an efficient, profitable monopoly providing the finest postal service in the world as well as being an important element in the structure of British life, but once Brussels got in on the act, our useless government acquiesced in this decimation of the postal service.
To make matters worse, the Royal Mail is now a victim to the compensation culture and health and safety police with the recent closure of delivery services to the Dales hamlet of Booze. Do you think the French would allow this to happen?
From: Thomas Pearson, Helredale Road, Whitby, North Yorkshire.
I AGREE with your readers who have commented on Royal Mail's decision to stop delivering to Booze, also some parts of East Cleveland.
I am a postman and deliver to remote places where the roads and tracks are a lot worse than the one at Booze which looks in a lot better condition than some of our main roads.
Royal Mail's proud boast is that we always deliver to the last mile; after all, that is our job.
Publicity like this does not look good for us and it is the postmen and women who have to face our customers and not the job cutting, money saving bosses.
It's time we ended the ragwort explosion
From: SR Hill, Mill Close, Todwick, Sheffield.
HAVING just returned from a 14-day trip to Cornwall and Gloucestershire,and read Bernard Robinson's letter (Yorkshire Post, August 5), I have been appalled at the vast amount of ragwort now flowering, like fields of rape
in spring.
The vast majority is on the roadside verges of every county, most particularly the motorways and major dual carriageways. These latter roads are the responsibility of the Highways Agency.
Under the Control of Ragwort Act 2003, and the Control of Weeds Act 1959, Defra – if a complaint is received – has to serve a notice on the responsible person to eradicate this most poisonous weed which is normally shunned by animals but if cut and wilted becomes palatable. Death is almost certain after ingestion and occurs up to six months after.
The plants are now in flower and each plant produces about 150,000 seeds. It is easy see how this ragwort population explosion occurred. What of succeeding years, the old adage that one year's seeding means seven years' weeding springs to mind.
Great credit, therefore, to the Penzance area authority who had two teams of workmen
out with pick-up trucks full and digging it up by the roots.
Comments from our own local authorities would be most welcome.
From: Matthew Shaw, Golcar, Huddersfield.
BERNARD Robinson's "growing crime" letter on ragwort caught my attention. As I understand it, the plant only becomes harmful when unsuspecting livestock eat it in their hay. Grazers would normally nibble around these impressive weeds, providing a home for the beautiful cinnabar moth caterpillar along with dozens of other insect species.
Bracken is more of a nuisance to our open spaces – this carcinogenic and invasive fern can cause whole swathes of countryside to vanish under a thick green carpet. It has a similar "deadening" effect on landscape to the dreaded conifer plantation, a monoculture devoid of any diversity. Wearing gloves, I've been clearing a patch where I walk with my dog, an area which is fast disappearing under bracken. Underneath was anaemic looking heather which, once exposed to sunlight, has soon perked up and is now displaying its lovely flower.Bus service is a music hall joke
From: Frazer Irwin, Queens Road, Ilkley.
THERE was a time Ilkley folk could travel by bus direct to Harrogate. Until a wise person in a distant town thought otherwise and we had to change at Otley.
Now the last remaining service, 653, has been replaced by a music hall joke. That is, take a bus to Otley and second to the airport, then a third to Harrogate. Or, take a bus to Otley, a second to Menston, a train to Leeds and another to Harrogate.
Is this what is meant by the carbon footprint? That which stamps the life out of small communities, haulage firms, motorists and anyone else trying to lead a stress free life.
There are some who, for one reason or another, cannot use the rail system. Who do not own private transport. Who prefer the public omnibus. How are they to visit Harrogate when the last bus leaves after schools finish? Alternatively, how are folk from their end to travel to Wharfedale by bus?
Who comes up with these idiotic routes and times? No doubt it is their infernal consumption machines which clog our countryside, our towns and our cities. American visitors couldn't believe how we exist with this transport system.
If we are to believe all the carbon footprint hype, I suggest First reorganise their corporate thinking. Use the surplus from well used routes to supplement those supposedly not. Make travel on their vehicles worth while. Stop lining their shareholders' pockets, give a service all can use. Music hall artists included.
Toll of the 'aerial rats'
From: C Metcalf, Sherburn in Elmet.
ABOUT 30 years ago, in another village and another life, I was roused just after dawn by a delightful cooing of what turned out to be a ring dove, at that time quite unusual.
Nowadays, I am awoken as each day dawns to the irritating sound of dozens of them, perched four or five to every television aerial, rooftop and street light in the neighbourhood. Their faeces, slimy obnoxious and wet on damp days, and blowing about as toxic dust in fine weather, litter the ground below my TV aerial.
They are splattered on my car and drive, waste bins and doorsteps, and they even manage to hit the gate catches.
The purpose of this letter is threefold. Firstly, to ask that Defra involves itself in the extermination of at least 75 per cent of these aerial rats, for they are no more than that.
Secondly, for every farmer or landowner to take the same action, and, thirdly, to ask if there is any way in which a householder like myself can do something to rid myself of these pests legally.
Quite obviously a shotgun in suburbia would not go down too well, but how about poisoning or shooting with an air weapon, within the boundaries of my own garden, of course?
Don't watch these Olympics smothered by fear
From: Coun Leslie Rowe, Richmond Road, Brompton on Swale, Richmond,
North Yorkshire.
THE smog that covers China is not just atmospheric pollution. A climate of fear and repression is the cause of widespread protest across China.
The violent suppression of Tibetan dissidents has been sheathed in a smog of secrecy by Chinese officials, scared that the world will see the true totalitarian nature of the Chinese regime and its illegal occupation of Tibet. The brave attempts by British and other foreign students to highlight the underlying hypocrisy of the Beijing Olympics has led to their swift arrest. Japanese journalists wishing to report on the violence in Xinjiang province have been arrested and beaten.
Even the designer of the Olympic stadium in Beijing, Ai Weiwei, has denounced China as a "police state". He claims that the government in China is using the "terrorist threat" as an excuse to strengthen its power, an excuse we are familiar with
in Britain.
The health of every athlete at the Chinese Olympics is at risk. The risk is not just to their physical health, though with heavy pollution and gun-toting paramilitaries, that risk is very real. Their moral health is also at risk in tacitly supporting such a repressive regime. Would these same athletes had gone if the Olympics had been staged in Zimbabwe, for instance?
All British athletes should return home and the British public should boycott the TV broadcasts. The Olympic Games are now just a circus to be exploited for commercial gain and international kudos. A boycott at this stage would tell the world that, despite their Government, the British people have principles for which they are willing to make sacrifices. So, don't watch the Olympics, but show your support for
sport by going for a run (or walk) in the beautiful Yorkshire Dales instead.
Going concerns
From: D Harrop, Malton Street, Sheffield.
YOUR columnist Bernard Dineen suggests (Yorkshire Post, August 4) that "a high percentage of our citizens would like to emigrate to get
out of this politically correct madhouse". No doubt this is so.
Before they leave, I hope they will consider two points: one, wherever they emigrate to, they will then take on the status of migrant in a foreign land; two, the number of British natives in this country as a proportion of the total population will be diminished by their departure.
The latter, no doubt unintended consequence, is deeply worrying to some of us.
Smiles worse
From: Alan W Briglin, Sefton Street, Hull.
TRUE to form, here we have David Miliband being the perfect politician with his "stab you in the back to further my ambitions" attitude. Has anyone ever seen a more smug, self-satisfied face than that of the Foreign Secretary?
To me, that Cheshire Cat grin of his is just nauseating. Having seen him on BBC's Question Time and speaking on TV several times, it is my view that he will be absolutely useless as the leader of any political party.
Email to a friend
Print this page- Leeds lose Ward to Palace: Is there anyone they can afford now?
- Sheffield Wednesday leaving it late to hijack Leeds United over Ward
- As Snodgrass dithers over Leeds, Warnock throws a lifeline
- Ball is in Leeds United’s court over contract - Snodgrass
- Police turning blind eye to Asian voter fraud, says MP
Looking for...
Featured advertisers
Jobs
Search for a job
Motors
Search for a car
Property
Search for a house
Weather for Yorkshire
Saturday 26 May 2012
Today
Sunny
Temperature: 8 C to 21 C
Wind Speed: 17 mph
Wind direction: East
Tomorrow
Sunny
Temperature: 9 C to 22 C
Wind Speed: 13 mph
Wind direction: East
