Sponsored by
Why we all count the cost of our grossly overpaid MPs
From: John W Hemingway, Peep Green Road, Hartshead, Liversedge.
THANK you for publishing the article by David Craig (Yorkshire Post, June 2) about MPs' rate of pay and pension. It has been obvious for at least a decade that MPs are not underpaid, as they claim.
In fact, they are overpaid – and grossly so – in relation to the contribution they make to our national life. So are the present Ministers of the Crown when account is taken of their ineptitude, arrogance and incompetence.
While claiming to be "prudent", our erstwhile Chancellor damaged UK pension schemes by withdrawing tax exemption from their investment
incomes, sold our gold reserves when the price was low, introduced so many stealth taxes that we lost count of
them and spent the proceeds on hare-brained schemes without any discernible improvement.
As Prime Minister, he presides over grave misjudgments by his Ministers, pretending that all is going according to plan. The 10p tax fiasco is just one foolish error for which he cannot escape the blame. The Northern Rock debacle is another. Perhaps he should be arrested and held without charge for 42 days on suspicion of undermining the fabric of Great Britain – at least it would provide him with time to reflect on his many failures.
There is not one success to weigh on the other side of the scales. When can we have a General Election to teach him and his party the lesson they deserve?
From: Ian Smith, Colston Close, Bradford.
I WONDER if one or more MPs might be encouraged to respond to David Craig's article (Yorkshire Post, June 2), not so much about halving their numbers, but in relation to their vastly high incomes (I will not use the word "earnings"), compared with most of the electorate – you know, we who provide the funds for their enjoyment.
From: Robin L Wilkins, Chantry Close, Doncaster.
I HAVE read with interest the details of the expenses of Members of Parliament that are paid by us the taxpayer. There is no doubt that these people are engaged for more than full time in looking after our interests, so we should not quibble about the fact that we are required to pay the bills for window cleaning and gardening for example.
It does occur to me, however, that another band of people are engaged full time in looking after our interests throughout the world – our servicemen and women. Unfortunately, they are not in the position where they can nip home every couple of weeks to mow the lawn and clean the windows. Should they not be reimbursed on the same basis as Members of Parliament?
Or, am I being cynical in thinking that there are different rules for them and us?
From: David Rimington, Fairways Drive, Harrogate.
HOW can we stop MPs from fiddling their expenses and operating as a special breed of civil servants? The answer is quite simple. Let the political parties pay their MPs and councillors.
Fund the political parties from public funds, by payment for each vote received at a General Election. I would suggest 1 for each vote up to 100,000, plus 5 per vote thereafter.
A party getting 10 million votes would be paid 50m a year up to the next General Election. They could pay their MPs and councillors what they liked by way of salary and expenses, and the taxation and expenses rules could be the same as for any private company.
There would be great advantages and incentives for the people who voted. Even if they voted for a losing candidate, they would in effect be making a donation to the party of their choice. The political parties would, of
course, be free to raise additional funds.
It would be more democratic if the voting system were changed to the party list system as used in the European elections, and indeed in some countries for other elections, in order to give an element of proportional representation.
This would eliminate the corruption endemic in the present system.
Let's fight fire with fire like the French
From: David Quarrie, Lynden Way, Acomb, York.
IT is high time we fought fire with fire as regards the absurd EU rules that allow the unscrupulous Spanish and French fishing fleets to take certain types of fish from "our" waters and land them at English and Scottish harbours, while "our" fishermen have to watch idly by, and see their livelihoods ruined by our EU "partners" (Yorkshire Post, May 28).
We should blockade our ports, refuse to let the Spanish and French ships and boats leave, just as they do to our sailors during their fuel protests. Why do we let then run roughshod over us time and time again?
It is no use appealing to our politicians nor to our police force because both are equally terrified to act. We must adopt "French" tactics.
When the French farmers, or fishermen, or coal miners, or students, or teachers, or office workers, or lorry drivers are annoyed about something, they do not hesitate to cause trouble and bother to the authorities or to who ever it is who are frustrating them, and their patriotic police support them.
We should learn from them and adopt similar tactics.
Dismal state of Britain
From: David Wright,
Little Lane,
Easingwold,
North Yorkshire.
We appear to be obsessed with football, meaningless scandal and gossip about so-called celebrities plus failed politicians and their memoirs.
We, the public, have allowed this situation to develop because we have failed to get involved with politics and have allowed the liberal do-gooders and modernists to wreck our institutions and political scene by handing over our independence to the monolithic EU super state.
Our three main parties are all scrabbling in the failed centre ground while the good ship UK flounders in a sea of directives and regulations with only the nanny state to rescue. It is an even worse fate than George Orwell's 1984.
The end of the line
From: David Schofield, Greenway Close,
Leeds.
The letter from Coun Elizabeth Nash (Yorkshire Post, May 27) about the delights of walking along the disused Nidderdale railway is inaccurate in its date of closure.
The branch line up to Pateley Bridge was not closed in the 1960s under the programme agreed by Transport Ministers Ernest Marples, Tom Fraser and Barbara Castle between 1962 and 1968. In fact, the closure date for the Nidderdale line was April 1951.
Today, the Railway Ramblers' Organisation help use old railway lines through their guided walks and financial contributions towards maintenance of pathways.Teamwork behind NHS and surgery
From: Stella Harrison, Ashfield, Wetherby,
West Yorkshire.
REGARDING your story, "Yorkshire Hospital Trusts worst in the country for cancelling operations" (Yorkshire Post, May 31), Rob Waugh's research and presentation of this
report was fair, up to a
point, but where were the figures for the rest of the country?
Additionally, he did not consider the sizes of the trusts. Leeds Hospital Trust (Leeds Teaching Hospitals) is vast, so where was a comparison?
Your report merely cited trusts in Yorkshire without giving any other information, eg, sizes, specialisms etc.
I have been involved in the Leeds Teaching Hospitals for years and have seen them change from health authority to trust etc. Behind these
vast changes have been
human beings, grappling
with them, but moving
forward.
In conclusion, we need to be reminded that surgery requires a team of people – before, during and after. Even emergency surgery needs to have this before it can go ahead. It also has to be planned.
If one area or part is not available, then it cannot function. It is better to cancel than to risk life in an incomplete form.
Nonsense of eco-towns
From: Bob Lomas, Dragons Green, Horsham, Sussex.
THESE so called eco-towns are purely a dreamed up political nonsense emanating from the EU. They are planned to be built all over the EU.
We are not alone in our condemnations, the French
are very unhappy about them. Such towns would need hospitals, and where would the money come from to build them at a time when we cannot afford to keep open those that we have?
Who is supposed to pay for the building of these towns
at a time when the housing market is heading for a slump that is estimated to last a long time?
At considerable cost to the already overtaxed taxpayer, such a town has been planned for Arundel, in West
Sussex.
Last weekend, the whole site was flooded; perhaps we are to see the first New Venice in the EU. The whole debacle is a political farce.
From: Victoria McLauchlan, Tithe Barn Way, Kellington, North Yorkshire.
I WOULD simply like to say thank you for publishing the wonderful picture of our Kellington church protest against the possible eco-town around our villages (Yorkshire Post, May 26).
So many times our letters and protests have been accompanied on the news and in the press by views of a few fields with either Kellingley Colliery or Eggborough Power Station in the background. However, the photograph of the "human ring" around our beautiful, Norman church, St Edmunds, really did capture the spirit and essence of our strength of feeling.
We are ever more determined to battle against this disgraceful plan which is disguised by an "eco" label to ruin what the people of Kellington and Eggborough value so much – our villages, our fields and our footpaths, our rural way of life and the chance for our children to grow up and enjoy the same.
Prevention, not penalty, is the key over drinking
From: RC Curry, Adel Grange Close, Leeds.
ONCE again, the Government is coming out with the big stick approach to the problem of drinking by young people (Yorkshire Post, June 2).
What does it think will solve the problem? Parents will be fined if they do not impose the heavy hand which progressively has been stripped from them by several generations of discouraging and lax legislation.
Prevention, not penalty, should be the solution.
One way would be to rescind the extension of the licensing hours. Another could be a reduction in the number of outlets where drink can be purchased, off or on licence. That could include the removal of licensed premises from railway stations where poor and drunken behaviour is commonplace. Those who wish to use Leeds City Station have to run the gauntlet past a crowd who are plainly well "lit up".
As with drugs, it could initiate some training through schools to discourage this explosion of alcoholic fervour which is gripping the nation just like it did over a century ago when restrictions were applied.
But then, our Government seems to have no desire to
learn from the lessons of history, being too keen to "move on" after each self-inflicted disaster.
Hence the pretty pickle in which it has landed itself and the nation.
From: H Marjorie Gill, Clarence Drive, Menston.
PERHAPS a new approach? Why don't we invite young people to explain why they get drunk? So far nothing appears to work, but perhaps a query about how it is possible to enjoy making oneself desperately uncomfortable might discover some useful facts.
To tell people that actions are dangerous makes them appear daring and exciting which is what youngsters crave. Unfortunately our present environment of cushioning us all from danger has robbed children of the thrills which used to be a fact of daily life, so we have the damaging thrills associated with doing that which the outside world regards as bad behaviour.
From: Walter Leach, Middlewood Close,
Kilham, Driffield.
THE Government is now issuing instructions as to what age children "should begin drinking alcohol". What next – when they should begin swearing and when they should begin having sex?
It sounds like guidance on when bad habits should be adopted. Surely children should receive guidance on what they should NOT do, that is, not start drinking before the age of 18.
Email to a friend
Print this page- Leeds lose Ward to Palace: Is there anyone they can afford now?
- Sheffield Wednesday leaving it late to hijack Leeds United over Ward
- As Snodgrass dithers over Leeds, Warnock throws a lifeline
- Ball is in Leeds United’s court over contract - Snodgrass
- Police turning blind eye to Asian voter fraud, says MP
Looking for...
Featured advertisers
Jobs
Search for a job
Motors
Search for a car
Property
Search for a house
Weather for Yorkshire
Saturday 26 May 2012
Today
Sunny
Temperature: 8 C to 21 C
Wind Speed: 17 mph
Wind direction: East
Tomorrow
Sunny
Temperature: 9 C to 22 C
Wind Speed: 13 mph
Wind direction: East
