THERE was no alternative but to switch passengers to an “entirely unsuitable” station when King’s Cross could not open due to the Christmas rail engineering works overruns, the boss of Network Rail claimed to MPs today.
After the switch on Saturday December 27, Finsbury Park station in north London became so overcrowded that passengers could not alight from trains and the station had to shut for a time.
But NR network operations managing director Robin Gisby told MPs today: “It was the right decision to use Finsbury Park (as the terminus) and I would endorse that decision again.”
Appearing before the House of Commons Transport Committee, Mr Gisby said: “Finsbury Park was entirely unsuitable compared with King’s Cross but there was nothing else we could do.
“Any other decision would have caused even more discomfort for passengers.”
Mr Gisby was appearing alongside NR chief executive Mark Carne following the overruns that also affected Paddington station in London on December 27.
The overruns meant the closure of King’s Cross station in London for the whole of Saturday December 27, with Paddington station closed for a time and nearby Finsbury Park station having to shut for a period due to the overcrowding.
A Network Rail report published earlier this week revealed poor planning, equipment failures and communication breakdowns all contributed to the overruns.
Physical work near Paddington was completed on time but safety validation work that should have taken two hours took 10 hours, the report said.
When work near King’s Cross overran, the trains were switched to start and finish at Finsbury Park, but “not enough was done” to manage passenger flow at Finsbury Park.
Mr Carne told MPs that he, again, “unreservedly apologised” to passengers for the disruption on December 27. He said he thought the overrun at King’s Cross could have been declared earlier and communication about the use of platforms at Finsbury Park could have been improved.
Mr Carne said: “It is very clear that there are a lot of lessons to be learnt from this.”
In the week after the overruns, Mr Carne announced that he would not be taking his annual performance-related bonus for 2014/15. The bonus could have been as much as £135,000.
Asked about the bonus at today’s hearing, Mr Carne said he was the person responsible overall for the Christmas engineering programme but added that he considered that bonuses were earned for a performance over a whole year.
He said: “I know that the performances of the railway today are not meeting the public’s expectations on a number of fronts.
“We are not delivering.”
Mr Carne was in Cornwall for Christmas and said he was informed of the King’s Cross overrun at 2pm on Boxing Days and kept in touch by telephone from then on.
Another inquiry into the overruns has been announced. This will be overseen by rail industry body the Rail Delivery Group. Meanwhile, the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) has already launched its own inquiry.
One of the things the rail industry inquiry will look at is the possibility of moving major engineering projects away from the Christmas period.
Mr Carne said today that Christmas was a time when many passengers were young or elderly and many carried suitcases.
He went on: “If you decide not to do it at Christmas, you still have to do the work and there will be disruption. We may well end up doing it at Christmas because that is the time when there is the lowest impact on passengers and the economy.”