Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Redmayne Bentley Stockbrokers Logo
Sponsored by
Yorkshire’s Oldest and Award-Winning Stockbroker
Share Dealing and Investment Management Services
 
 
Friday, 21st November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Mark Hastings: A local difficulty as pubs are forced to weather the storm



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 March 2008
BRITAIN'S pubs are at the heart of every community – yet they have never been under such pressure. We are experiencing a "perfect storm" of rising costs, falling demand for our key product, draught beer, and grappling with the impact of a smoking ban that has hit sales hard.
This month's tax raid on beer, our national drink, will have a devastating impact. Chancellor Alistair Darling has hit the many millions of people who enjoy beer where it hurts – with a £50.5m a month raid on their family budgets.

Sales of beer in
pubs are at their lowest since the Great Depression of the 1930s. Today's pubs are selling 14 million fewer pints per day than they did when sales were at their peak in 1979.

At the same time, rapidly rising costs of raw materials and energy bills are hitting publicans hard. What makes this tax increase all the more surprising is that by aiming a tax hike at beer, the Chancellor is shooting himself in the foot.

With beer sales plummeting, Treasury revenues will continue to fall, pubs will continue to close and sales will sink even further.

Announcing a tax rise for each of the next four years is also a new departure that will make a bad situation even worse. It is also grossly unfair on the vast majority of sensible drinkers, who are being punished for the sins of a minority of drunken hooligans.

The Government says this move will tackle binge drinkers, but will it? In reality, it will not help at all. Alcohol taxes in the UK are already among the highest in the world. Instead, it will drive people out of the pub into the arms of the deep discounting supermarkets.
It will act as a charter for bootleggers and smugglers, heralding a return to the days of the "booze cruise".

It is also putting the cart before the horse. The tax rise has happened before the Government has completed and published a major report on pricing, promotions and harm in the drink sector.

What has happened to the Government's commitment to policy-making based on the evidence? It seems to have been thrown out of the window in the Budget.

Looking a little deeper at the numbers reveals a grim
picture. It is tempting to believe that the pub trade has faced a bonanza following the introduction of the Licensing Act in 2005 – but looking behind the myth of 24-hour drinking, nothing could be further from the truth.

With sales down and costs up, 1,409 pubs closed in 2006. The current rate of pub closures is even faster, and now stands at 27 a week – nearly four every day. Urban pubs have been hardest hit so far, with two per cent of all urban pubs closing in the last six months.

Pubs without the room to provide an attractive outside area for smokers, and those that are not heavily focused on food sales, have faced particular difficulties.

But it isn't just town pubs that are suffering.

At this rate of closure, many villages across Britain face a future without a pub over the next few years. It's becoming clear that a vital part of the fabric of community life, and part of our nation's heritage, is under threat.

Pubs are, of course, taking action to help weather this storm. Many have revamped their menus and catering.
Pub food has never been better, with over a billion meals now served every year.

Pubs have also invested £100m in outside areas for smokers since the smoking ban was introduced last year – but, of course, not all have the room to do so, and those that can't are really struggling.

Many village pubs are fighting back, with innovative ways of developing their businesses and serving their local community. We now have pubs serving great coffee, pubs that that have taken over the village post office, and pubs installing broadband internet to attract new customers.

Pubs will do what it takes to attract new business. From the Government, all we ask for is a fair deal along with a break from punitive taxes and the threat of ever increasing regulation.

The time has come for a radical change of approach based on a truer picture of our pubs.
Well-run pubs are a vital part of community life in Britain. They are not a source of crime and disorder, nor should they be a "cash cow" for a Government intent upon raising as much tax as possible from what
are often small, well-run family businesses.

Pubs can and must remain the centre of local life, bringing local people together. To lose that would be a tragedy for communities across Britain.


Mark Hastings is director of communications with the British Beer and Pub Association.





The full article contains 828 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 March 2008 8:17 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
Prev
1
2
1

mcmurphy,

31/03/2008 10:33:49
Is this the same Mark Hastings that shared a platform with ASH endorsing the smoking ban prior to the vote in the Commons? Perhaps he should look in the mirror before blaming Alistair Darling for the decline of the pub.
2

Roger, Newcastle,

31/03/2008 14:38:27
I really do feel for pubs, particularly with supermarket selling beer at less than cost price.

If you do your sums, 27 pubs closing a week equates to 1,404 (27x52) closing this year, which is 5 less than the 1,409 that closed in 2006, before the smoking ban.
3

Seasider,

UK 31/03/2008 23:23:23
Roger,
That is a misprint !,only 200 closed in 2006 but over 1400 in 2007 ,this upsurge is definately due to the smoking ban !
4

Roger, Newcastle,

01/04/2008 12:44:06
Seasider

Can I suggest you have a look at the following links to the Campaign for Real Ale?

The first suggests that an estimated 1626 pubs closed in 2005 - http://www.cambridge-camra.org.uk/ale/323/pub-closures.html

The second shows that 1320 closed in 2006 and 1657 in 2007. They don't seem to blame the smoking ban for their problems in the article. - http://www.camra.org.uk/page.aspx?o=272576

Cheap supermarket booze seems to be the villain here. CAMRA are independant, are you?
5

Rodney Barker,

01/04/2008 14:02:05
I used to enjoy a fag with my pint which I called the 'fish and chips sydrome' - one goes with the other.

It's about time that planning authorities where given the power to allow for the buildig of pubs and clubs for smokers only and staffed by smokers only. Non smokers would be discriminated against for a change
6

Seasider,

U.K 01/04/2008 22:03:10
Roger,
The figures I quoted were from the Sunday Post ,23/3/08 they also mentioned only 102 closed in 2005 and these figures are according to the british beer and pub association !this can be backed up if you look on www.freedom2choose.info ,Roger you only have to look around you to see pubs have shut recently,they have where I live and not just pubs but Bingo halls cafes ,restaurants and bookmakers !Laurel pub owners have just gone into liquidation who own Yates and Litten tree etc.,cheap supermarket booze has been around for years and I still went to the pub,not anymore though !
7

Roger, Newcastle,

02/04/2008 09:50:36
Seasider

CAMRA are independent. You mention the freedom2choose website - this is a pressure group opposed to the smoking ban.

The figure of 102 pubs that closed in 2005 is for SCOTLAND (pop c5 million). The Sunday Post is a SCOTTISH paper.
The figure of 1626 in 2005 from CAMRA is for ENGLAND (pop c50 million)

I know you are desperate to blame the smoking ban for all of the problems in the licensed trade but at least compare figures for the same country!

Only the handful of people in your pressure group think the smoking ban is the total cause of the problems.

People within the trade all see the problems are far more complex, and most of the problems are to do with rising costs and unfair competition from supermarkets.
8

Seasider,

U.K 02/04/2008 21:12:51
Roger,
The figures I quoted were repeated on Radio 5 live today 2/4/08 as they discussed the demise of the british pub, so someone has got their figures wrong ?no I am not saying it has all to do with the smoking ban the other things you mentioned are relevant but five live said there was 7 times as many closures in 2007 than 2006 over 1400 as I mentioned ,you can probably hear this again on real player ,3pm hosted by Simon Mayo !
I have also heard about the Camra book and apparently they have been saying some strange things in the new addition about smoking spoiling the taste of beer ?the organisation must of suddenly turned antismokers or they are trying to entice more smokers to drink their ale as they know most smokers are now either not going to pubs or are going much less frequently ? ,sounds like camra have made a mistake in their pub closure figures like they have made a mistake of smoking spoiling the taste of their beer ? as more smokers used to visit pubs than non smokers the opposite can be said as most smokers know !
9

Seasider,

U.K 05/04/2008 23:24:02
Roger,
not heard from you lately ? you must of looked on the British beer and pub associations website ? an independant group ! the facts are clearly there ! Ha ! Ha! told you I was right and it,s going to get worse ,unless this silly smoking ban is scrapped or amended !
10

Roger, Newcastle,

06/04/2008 09:18:59
Seasider
I have found and read the beer and pub association press release and I think they are being very misleading in it. I was incorrect to suggest the figures were from Scotland, they are actually quoting the reduction in the overall numbers of pubs for previous years (ie the number closing minus the number opening)
They say "1,409 pubs closed during 2007. This is a sharp acceleration on previous years. Pub numbers were down 216 in 2006 - four a week - following a fall of 102 in 2005 – two a week. "
They don't, however, say how many pubs have opened in 2007 so you can't directly compare the 3 figures.
The CAMRA figures show just show closures, and you can do a like for like comparison between the years.
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.