Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Redmayne Bentley Stockbrokers Logo
Sponsored by
Yorkshire’s Oldest and Award-Winning Stockbroker
Share Dealing and Investment Management Services
 
 
Saturday, 4th July 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Bates free to stay at Elland Road



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
19 October 2007
A JUDGE has criticised an apparent attempt to keep a High Court hearing involving Leeds United chairman Ken Bates secret.
Mr Bates and two other directors made an application to be allowed to continue to remain directors of the club after their involvement in a previous Leeds United-related liquidiation left them in breach of insolvency rules.

Judge Langan QC accepted the application but then revealed the court had received a request ahead of the hearing that the names of Mr Bates, his legal advisor Mark Taylor, and club director Shaun Harvey - none of whom were in court yesterday - remain anonymous.

He said: "I want to raise one point as a matter of concern. There was a telephone call to court yesterday taken by a fairly junior member of staff with reference that this case be listed without reference to the names of the parties.

"There are some names for which anonymising on the list is essential, the obvious example being family cases. But I don't know what prompted the request to be made in this case.

"Put bluntly, if it was done in this case, it should have to be done in every case. The public is entitled to know what cases are being heard."

Louis Doyle, the barrister representing the three directors, told the court that he wasn't aware of the approach being made and Mr Bates last night said he "knew nothing about it" and that he would be "very happy to be named".

The legal firm which made the application said it was thought it would be in the "best interests of the hearing".

Mr Bates tonight described the successful application as "another little win", adding "which isn't good news for the people who tried to cause trouble."



The full article contains 316 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 October 2007 2:48 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.