Blunkett’s regrets on injustices from IPPs

Have your say

The former home secretary responsible for introducing indeterminate prison sentences said he “regrets very much” the problems caused by the way they were implemented.

Offenders given the sentences are not released until they are assessed as posing no danger to the public, and David Blunkett said the Labour government was not “effective enough” in making the necessary resources available to provide rehabilitation courses for those jailed under the measures.

Indeterminate sentences for public protection (IPPs) were abolished in 2012 but thousands that had already been handed down remain in force.

The Criminal Justice Act of 2003 introduced IPPs for serious sexual and violent offenders in England and Wales, but because the provisions were quite broad judges began using them for more offenders than expected.

Mr Blunkett told BBC2’s Newsnight the government was not clear enough in setting out sentencing criteria for judges.

“The consequence of bringing that Act in has led, in some cases, to an injustice and I regret that,” he told the BBC.

Newsnight highlighted the case of Richard Huxley, who remains in prison more than eight years after being given an IPP with a minimum tariff of 17 months for assault and attempted robbery.

Mr Blunkett said: “I would say that this is an injustice. I would say that the original intention had nothing to do with circumstances where people would be held way beyond the normal tariff, in a situation where in some instances they have not been able to take the necessary course and demonstrate the rehabilitation necessary for changing their behaviour.”