Call for Home Secretary to lift ban on Bradford marches

THE Home Secretary should lift the ban on marches in Bradford or risk making protesters more radical, a think-tank has said.

Banning protests from extremist groups was an ineffective way of combating their ideology, Demos said.

The warning comes as police in Bradford continue to plan for clashes between supporters of the English Defence League (EDL) and their opponents this weekend - despite Home Secretary Theresa May authorising a blanket ban on marches in the city.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Jamie Bartlett, a researcher at Demos, said banning the march "could push members of the English Defence League into more radical groups like Combat 18 or the Racial Volunteer Force".

"Far from being destructive, protest can be an important outlet for that anger and frustration that could tip into violence and helps people to feel a sense of belonging to the society in which they live," he said.

"The Government should show that being radical or extreme is acceptable in an open and free society like the UK. The same rules must apply to everyone, whether they are radical Islamist groups or the English Defence League."

The far-right group EDL planned to march through Bradford on Saturday, and Unite Against Fascism had planned a protest in the city on the same day.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

But the Home Secretary authorised a blanket ban on marches in the city last week following a request by West Yorkshire chief constable Sir Norman Bettison. Sir Norman said he was taking the action after considering the "understandable concerns of the community".

Police and council chiefs welcomed the ban, but warned possible static demonstrations may still go ahead. The proposed protests have raised fears of a possible repeat of the devastating 2001 riots following an attempted march by the National Front.

A Home Office spokeswoman said: "The Government is committed to restoring the right to non-violent protest, but violence and intimidation are wholly unacceptable. Rights to protest must be carefully balanced against the need to ensure local communities and property are protected."