Cameron heralds rundown of state structure

The Government is dismantling “big-state structure” to give people a greater choice of public services, David Cameron has said.

People could be given a legal “right to choose” which schools and hospitals they use and staff working in the public sector will get more power to take over the services they provide by forming John Lewis-style mutual firms.

In an update to the Government’s programme of sweeping reforms, Ministers signalled a greater role for the private sector and voluntary organisations across a range of public services.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Mr Cameron said: “Nearly two years on from coming into office, brick by brick, edifice by edifice, we are slowly dismantling the big-state structures we inherited from the last government.

“We are putting people in control, giving them the choices and chances that they get in almost every other area of life.

“There is still a way to go and this kind of change will not happen overnight but no-one should doubt my determination to make our public services better, by opening them up. I will not rest until the job is done.”

An update to the Open Services White Paper said the move involved re-thinking the role of government to become funder and regulators rather than “attempting to run the public services from a desk in Whitehall, city hall or county hall”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The Government announced an independent review to establish how choice could be extended.

Ministers have set out plans for draft legislation to enshrine the right to choose in law, but one critic branded it unworkable.

Institute for Government programme director Tom Gash said: “Creating a ‘right to choose’ may provide a valuable signal to the public sector that the Government is committed to increasing individuals’ power to choose the public service provider they want.

“However, it is likely to prove unworkable in practice.” He went on: “Do I have a choice of schools for example if I live in a remote area and the second nearest school is 30 miles away?”

Mr Gash said specifying what constituted fair choice might end up producing the kind of bureaucratic exercise it sought to avoid.