Date set for West Yorkshire Chief Constable's High Court hearing

West Yorkshire's former Chief Constable and the county's crime commissioner are set to face each other at the High Court in the latest stage of the legal dispute over the senior officer's departure from the force.

Mark Gilmore is pictured with police commissioner Mark Burns-Williamson

Mark Gilmore, who retired from policing last summer, has applied for a judicial review into what he says was the “continuing failure” of Mark Burns-Williamson to decide whether he has a case to answer for misconduct.

Leave to apply has now been granted by the Administrative Court, meaning a two-day hearing will take place at the Royal Courts of Justice from November 1.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

Ernie Waterworth, a solicitor with Belfast firm MTB, which represents Mr Gilmore, said: “My client welcomes this important decision by the court, it is a significant step.

“The next stage of the legal process has now commenced and we feel it would be inappropriate to make any further comment at this stage.”

The Belfast-born officer was suspended on full pay by Mark Burns-Williamson in June 2014 when news emerged of the investigation by Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) into his relationship with a leading local car dealership.

The Chief Constable, who insists he has done nothing wrong, had his suspension lifted in 2015 when Northern Irish prosecutors said he had no criminal case to answer.

But he did not return to his job as Mr Burns-Williamson commissioned Lancashire Police to determine whether he had a case to answer for misconduct.

After receiving the report on July 26 last year, West Yorkshire’s police and crime commissioner then decided there was a case to answer on both allegations, meaning the man he appointed in 2013 would potentially face an embarrassing public misconduct hearing.

In August Mr Gilmore announced he would retire on full pension, meaning he was no longer subject to misconduct proceedings.

He has applied for a judicial review into what he says was the “continuing failure” of Mr Burns-Williamson to formally decide whether he has a case to answer for misconduct.

But the PCC says he is not obliged to make such a decision for someone who is no longer a police officer.