Five years for Rolf Harris as court hears how abuse haunted his young victim

0
Have your say

ROLF Harris faces spending the rest of his natural life behind bars after he was jailed for five years and nine months for a string of sex crimes involving four girls.

Rolf had stash of computer porn

Rolf Harris arriving at Southwark Crown Court, London

Rolf Harris arriving at Southwark Crown Court, London

The 84-year-old entertainer, a family favourite for decades, was finally unmasked as a prolific paedophile with his conviction for 12 indecent assaults on Monday.

Today at London’s Southwark Crown Court Mr Justice Sweeney told the shamed performer: “You have shown no remorse for your crimes at all. Your reputation lies in ruins, you have been stripped of your honours, but you have no one to blame but yourself.”

Harris was unanimously found guilty of molesting four girls - one woman who was just seven or eight and was groped when she asked for his autograph, and another two who fell prey as young teenagers.

The veteran presenter, who charmed television audiences for decades, was also convicted of a catalogue of abuse against his daughter’s then-best friend, who prosecutors said Harris groomed from the age of 13 and used like “his little toy”.

Rolf Harris arriving at Southwark Crown Court, London

Rolf Harris arriving at Southwark Crown Court, London

The accusations dated between 1968 and 1986, and the girls were targeted between the ages of seven or eight and 19.

Harris, who earlier travelled from his Bray home by boat, sat in the glass-walled dock with a striped suitcase by his side remained impassive as sentence was passed, with daughter Bindi watching from the gallery.

His frail wife Alwen did not come to court today, although she has attended much of the trial.

Harris had a small reprieve this morning as prosecutors confirmed he will not stand trial over allegations that he downloaded sexual images of children.

Passing sentence in a packed courtroom, the judge told Harris: “For well over 50 years you have been a popular entertainer and TV personality of international standing with a speciality in children’s entertainment. You are also an artist of renown. You have been the recipient of a number of honours and awards over the years, you have done many good and charitable works and numerous people have attested to your positive good character.

“But the verdicts of the jury show that in the period from 1969 to 1986 you were also a sex offender, committing 12 indecent assaults on four victims who were variously aged between eight and 19 at the time.

“There were a number of aggravating features. You took advantage of the trust placed in you because of your celebrity status to commit the offences against three of the victims.

“All your offences in relation to (Bindi’s friend) were committed in breach of the trust that her parents had placed in you and two of them took place in her own home.

“In every case the age gap between you and the victim was a very considerable one. You clearly got a thrill from committing the offences while others were present or nearby. Whilst others did not realise what you were doing their presence added to the ordeal of your victims.”

Mr Justice Sweeney told the entertainer: “Rolf Harris, the sentence I pass upon you in total is one of five years and nine months imprisonment.

“Unless released earlier, you will serve half that sentence when you will be released on licence for the remainder of your sentence.

“Should you break the terms of that licence, including by commission of further offences, you will be liable to recall.”

The judge told the court he did not feel it was appropriate to order Harris to pay compensation to his victims, but said: “You will, however, pay the costs of the prosecution in such sum as may be agreed or assessed in due course.”

Harris’s QC Sonia Woodley said earlier that Harris was already living on “borrowed time” and had been punished away from the court already by being publicly shamed.

She said the star’s last sexual encounter with Bindi’s friend was in 1994, and told the judge: “It means that for the last 20 years he has led an upright life.”

She went on: “There are two sides to him and it’s a fact that he has a good side to him. Yes he must be punished for the offences that he has committed but it would be unfair to ignore the good that he has done in his life.”

The court heard that his age means that he may die behind bars. Ms Woodley said: “As a man of 84 as he is he is already on borrowed time. Every day, every month, in prison is going to shorten his life.”

She went on: “The impact upon this defendant is going to be far greater than a sentence imposed upon a younger and more healthy man.”

Police are now looking into dozens more claims from alleged victims in the UK, Australia and New Zealand.

The charges Harris was convicted of concern one woman who was groped when she was just seven or eight and asked for his autograph, another two who fell prey as teenagers, and a catalogue of abuse against his daughter’s then best friend.

During the trial, the court also heard from six other women who claim they were groped by Harris while abroad, including one who told the jury the artist forced his tongue in her mouth when she was 11 or 12.

She was off sick from school at a family friend’s house in Australia in 1969, when Harris told her “I want to be the first person to introduce you to a tongue kiss”, before he pounced.

Prosecutors also tried to use evidence from another seven women with similar accounts, including a celebrity who said she was groped on live TV, but this was deemed inadmissible.

Since his conviction, Harris, who has been stripped of his Bafta fellowship and faces losing his CBE, has also lost an honorary degree from the University of East London.

Questions have been raised over the future of his artwork, which includes a portrait of the Queen, and authorities in his native Western Australia are planning to remove tributes.

Peter Watt, director of national services at the NSPCC, said: “Harris was opportunistic and brazen in targeting young girls and women. He took advantage of their trust in him and we heard through the evidence of his courageous victims just how profoundly damaging his abuse was on them for decades after.

“This sentence reflects the seriousness of his crimes and hopefully those he preyed upon can finally find some peace. It sends a message that no one is untouchable and justice can come at any time.

“Harris has not shown any remorse for what he has done and treated the whole court case like just another performance. Thankfully the jury saw through this charade and he will now have a considerable amount of time to reflect on the impact of his crimes.”