The Government’s pledge to give GPs freedom over buying services for patients could be a hollow promise, according to doctors’ leaders.
The British Medical Association (BMA) says NHS reforms could see Health Secretary Andrew Lansley and a new NHS Commissioning Board granted powers that are “overly restrictive and controlling”.
But the Government hit back at the claims, with Health Minister Simon Burns describing them as “nonsense”.
The Health and Social Care Bill is currently being debated by MPs with a view to handing 80 per cent of the NHS budget to family doctors.
Doctors are forming into groups – “consortia” – to work on commissioning services.
The BMA says clauses in the Bill go against Government pledges to put doctors “in the driving seat” and could prevent them from improving patient care.
The union is concerned that the NHS Commissioning Board, which will oversee commissioning of services, will not be able to operate autonomously and free from political control.
Mr Lansley would also be able to impose “any conditions on consortia without review”, according to the BMA.
The NHS Commissioning Board could dismiss a consortium’s Accountable Officer and could dissolve a consortia without consultation.
Dr Laurence Buckman, chairman of the BMA’s GPs committee, said: “The NHS Commissioning Board will be given sweeping powers to get involved with the way consortia operate. Time and time again in the Bill we see no mention of the need to consult consortia on matters that will have a direct and potentially very significant impact on the way they operate.
“And when it comes to the dissolution of a consortium, the most serious act of all, there is no requirement to consult the consortium or the public, and no recourse for appeal.”
As it stands, Mr Lansley and the commissioning board “are being granted powers that are far too wide-ranging and seem to go against the promise to devolve power to local clinicians,” he said.
Health Minister Simon Burns said: “This is nonsense. The Bill gives GPs power to purchase and design services on behalf of their patients in a way that isn’t possible at present.
“It also restricts, for the first time, the discretion of ministers to interfere in day-to-day decisions in the NHS.”