‘Inherent absurdity’ in Redknapp bungs claim

The prosecution case at Harry Redknapp’s tax evasion trial is “repugnant to all our basic instincts of fairness”, a court has heard.

Defence barrister John Kelsey-Fry QC launched a fierce attack on the Crown for using a News of the World investigation as its “crucial linchpin” in the case.

“There is an inherent absurdity that shrieks out at you” in some of the allegations that Redknapp took £189,000 in bungs, he told Southwark Crown Court. In his closing speech, the barrister said the Crown was relying on “primarily despicable” evidence gathered by reporter Rob Beasley.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

He said: “It is repugnant to all our basic instincts of fairness in the criminal justice process.”

Lord Macdonald QC, defence lawyer for Milan Mandaric – Redknapp’s former chairman at Portsmouth – said the prosecution was “really flailing” with “paper-thin” explanations for the payments.

The trial continues today.