MPs urge flexibility on EU rules for farms

than the current system – adding costly bureaucracy and generating more errors in the system.

While supporting the Commission’s desire to improve the environment, the EFRA Committee calls for the EU to set high-level objectives for the CAP that provide for flexibility to apply the right measures for local conditions through “decentralising” environmental protection under the CAP to member states.

“Our report highlights the huge benefit that UK ‘agri-environment’ schemes have brought to biodiversity, food production and the countryside,” Ms McIntosh said.

“We can be proud of what UK farmers have achieved using these voluntary schemes that allow them to manage their land in ways that enhance biodiversity and food production, for example by encouraging pollinators.

“We have also urged Defra to ensure that the UK’s tenant farmers should not be excluded from these schemes.”

The Committee said that Defra must ensure the balance of funding between mandatory and voluntary aspects of the CAP should not leave UK farmers at a competitive disadvantage relative to their counterparts in the rest of Europe.

In conclusion the MPs acknowledge that, of the three ‘greening’ measures offered, the Commission’s proposal for Ecological Focus Areas (EFA) has the potential to deliver the greatest environmental benefit. However, the lack of definitions within the proposals make it difficult to assess what, if any, such benefits would actually be delivered.

A Defra spokesperson said: “We are working hard to negotiate a more environmentally-friendly CAP which works for the UK’s farmers and uses taxpayers’ money more effectively – allowing more production at less cost to the environment. We’re glad the Commission is starting to change its position on greening, but we want a more flexible approach that would allow Member States to green the CAP in a way that works best for them.”

Comment: Page 12.