The new trains due to arrive at platfom two... have been postponed

PLANS to replace the ageing fleet of intercity trains have been postponed, as Transport Secretary Lord Adonis admitted the multi-billion pound, 30-year intercity express procurement programme had "run into difficulties".

Lord Adonis said he thought it was not appropriate to enter into the contract in the immediate run-up to a general selection and he had ordered an independent assessment of the value for money of the intercity programme.

All being well, there were plans to proceed with the project in the next Parliament "subject to satisfactory resolution of all the contractual issues".

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In order to replace Britain's fleet of Intercity 125 trains and to invest in capacity and passenger journey improvements on the East Coast and Great Western main lines, the Government began the Intercity Express Programme procurement in 2007.

Lord Adonis said that good progress had been made, including the announcement of Agility Trains as preferred bidder in February 2009.

He went on: "Over the course of the procurement, however, there has been a reduction in the capacity of the debt market to support the transaction as originally envisaged, and passenger growth has also slowed.

"In addition the Government and Network Rail have committed to electrify the Great Western Main Line from 2016. The Government has identified appropriate adjustments to the original programme to take account of these developments.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

"This has inevitably extended the contractual negotiations, which are not yet complete and would not be so until mid-March at the earliest."

Lord Adonis continued: "The negotiations are for a contract of nearly 30 years, a multi-billion pound spend over the course of many Parliaments.

"In all the circumstances, the Government does not believe it would be appropriate to enter into this particular contract in the immediate run up to a general election.

"To ensure that a decision is taken at the beginning of the next Parliament on the basis of the fullest evaluation, I have today asked Sir Andrew Foster, former controller of the Audit Commission, to provide an independent assessment of the value for money of the programme and the credibility and the value for money of any alternatives which meet the programme's objectives."

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

He added: "It is critical for rail passengers that the right long-term decision is made about the next generation of inter-city trains, which will have a life of 30 years or more.

"The existing rolling stock dates back to the 1970s and needs to be replaced. If Sir Andrew reaffirms that the intercity express programme is better than the alternatives, my intention would be to proceed with the project in the next Parliament, subject to satisfactory resolution of all the contractual issues."

Lord Adonis said Sir Andrew would report within three months.

Agility Trains said: "Since designation as preferred bidder in February 2009, we have been working hard to meet the Government's requirements for the intercity express programme.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

"We are disappointed that a contract will not be concluded before the UK general election.

"However, we will continue our ambitious planning for production and maintenance facilities in the UK to support the programme, in anticipation of concluding the contract under the next Parliament."

Shadow transport secretary Theresa Villiers said: "The intercity express programme has been blighted by Government incompetence at every turn.

"It was Labour's obsessive micro-management of our railways that led to Whitehall officials designing trains down to the last bolt, which created huge cost inflation.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

"With the most overcrowded trains under Labour running at over 170% capacity, Lord Adonis has badly let down passengers by failing to keep his promises on additional capacity. This is the latest in a long line of incompetence and broken promises from Labour."

Michael Roberts, chief executive of the Association of Train Operating Companies, said: "While this may not be a surprising decision given the economic climate and the complexity of the project, it is vital that there isn't a significant delay in reaching a decision, as new trains that will improve services for passengers are much needed.

"The best way to get value for money would be to give train companies a greater role in buying their own rolling stock. This would get things done quicker and cheaper, ensure that the right rolling stock gets to the right places at the right time and give passengers and taxpayers the best deal.

"An independent assessment of the scheme will provide a good opportunity for ministers to rethink their approach and ensure that value for money is at the heart of the programme."

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Liberal Democrat transport spokesman Norman Baker said: "The Government has wasted millions of pounds on this scheme already.

"This is a hugely controversial contract and it is right to postpone it, but it should not have got this far in the first place."

Anthony Smith, chief executive of rail customer watchdog Passenger Focus, said: "Passengers consistently tell us that their top priorities for improvement on the railway are more trains, punctual services and being able to get a seat.

"Passengers desperately want to see these new trains with more seats and a more comfortable journey in service as quickly as possible.

"We hope whichever party is in power after the next election will pick up these plans and move the project ahead as quickly as possible."