Bradford, Calderdale and Kirklees deserve better than this contempt – Andrew Vine

IT’S doubtful if the people of Bradford, Calderdale and Kirklees entered this week with any faith in the Government’s ability to manage coronavirus.
A worshipper observes social distancing at the Bradford Central  Mosque on the first day of Eid, in Bradford, West Yorkshire, one of the areas where new measures have been implemented to prevent the spread of coronavirus. Stricter rules have been introduced for people in Greater Manchester, parts of East Lancashire, and West Yorkshire, banning members of different households from meeting each other indoors. Photo: Danny Lawson / PA.A worshipper observes social distancing at the Bradford Central  Mosque on the first day of Eid, in Bradford, West Yorkshire, one of the areas where new measures have been implemented to prevent the spread of coronavirus. Stricter rules have been introduced for people in Greater Manchester, parts of East Lancashire, and West Yorkshire, banning members of different households from meeting each other indoors. Photo: Danny Lawson / PA.
A worshipper observes social distancing at the Bradford Central Mosque on the first day of Eid, in Bradford, West Yorkshire, one of the areas where new measures have been implemented to prevent the spread of coronavirus. Stricter rules have been introduced for people in Greater Manchester, parts of East Lancashire, and West Yorkshire, banning members of different households from meeting each other indoors. Photo: Danny Lawson / PA.

Instead, with their lives under renewed restrictions on movement and meetings between households, those people would be perfectly justified in feeling that they are at the mercy of the muddle and failings that pass for trying to contain the pandemic.

The rushed and ill-prepared announcement that plunged a large swathe of West Yorkshire into uncertainty and even fear was characteristic of the hash that has been made of dealing with Covid-19.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It wasn’t only family lives and plans to celebrate Eid that were thrown into chaos, but businesses too.

Worshippers observe social distancing as they arrive at the Bradford Grand Mosque in Bradford, West Yorkshire, on the first day of Eid, one of the areas where new measures have been implemented to prevent the spread of coronavirus. Stricter rules have been introduced for people in Greater Manchester, parts of East Lancashire, and West Yorkshire, banning members of different households from meeting each other indoors.Worshippers observe social distancing as they arrive at the Bradford Grand Mosque in Bradford, West Yorkshire, on the first day of Eid, one of the areas where new measures have been implemented to prevent the spread of coronavirus. Stricter rules have been introduced for people in Greater Manchester, parts of East Lancashire, and West Yorkshire, banning members of different households from meeting each other indoors.
Worshippers observe social distancing as they arrive at the Bradford Grand Mosque in Bradford, West Yorkshire, on the first day of Eid, one of the areas where new measures have been implemented to prevent the spread of coronavirus. Stricter rules have been introduced for people in Greater Manchester, parts of East Lancashire, and West Yorkshire, banning members of different households from meeting each other indoors.

The impact of coronavirus on people’s livelihoods in the three areas was already likely to be devastating, because they are not the most affluent places in Yorkshire and any economic blow will hit especially hard.

But now, with them under an indefinite period of local lockdown, the threat to jobs and the ability of firms to stay afloat must be even more serious.

Residents can only hope that their fate is not to be that of the people of Leicester, now 19 weeks into lockdown with no end in sight.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

There are some serious questions for the Government to answer over these announcements that have created such difficulties for Bradford, Huddersfield and Halifax, and all the smaller places clustered around them.

A Covid-19 testing centre at Mixenden Activity Centre in Calderdale, one of the areas where new measures have been implemented to prevent the spread of coronavirus. Stricter rules have been introduced for people in Greater Manchester, parts of East Lancashire, and West Yorkshire, banning members of different households from meeting each other indoors. PA Photo.A Covid-19 testing centre at Mixenden Activity Centre in Calderdale, one of the areas where new measures have been implemented to prevent the spread of coronavirus. Stricter rules have been introduced for people in Greater Manchester, parts of East Lancashire, and West Yorkshire, banning members of different households from meeting each other indoors. PA Photo.
A Covid-19 testing centre at Mixenden Activity Centre in Calderdale, one of the areas where new measures have been implemented to prevent the spread of coronavirus. Stricter rules have been introduced for people in Greater Manchester, parts of East Lancashire, and West Yorkshire, banning members of different households from meeting each other indoors. PA Photo.

The first has to be why was there no warning that this might be coming? If there was an upward trend in cases, then surely that should have been flagged up and efforts redoubled to nip them in the bud before moving to a lockdown with seriously damaging effects on the areas’ economy?

And was enough done to communicate to the local populations that they were at a heightened risk? If the people had been made aware, there can be no question that they would have responded by taking extra precautions to keep themselves and their loved ones safe.

Was it necessary to shut down entire metropolitan districts, including towns and villages far from the densely-populated inner-city areas where the virus is most likely to spread?

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In Liverpool, where there has been a spike in cases, most have been tracked to a single council ward, where health officials are focusing their efforts. Could this targeted approach have worked in Yorkshire?

Instead, we got a sledgehammer announcement that raised more questions than it answered. Should people go to work, as the Government has urged, or continue to stay at home? Bradford, Calderdale and Kirklees can only guess. And how are the new restrictions to be enforced? If it is to be a police responsibility, they are faced with an utterly impossible task in trying to stablish if people from different households are meeting.

Nor is it clear if the local lockdowns will prevent children returning to school next month, raising the possibility of their education being compromised still further and presenting parents with continuing childcare problems that might make it difficult for them to go back to work.

There is a distinct air about what is happening in West Yorkshire of the Government making up policy on the hoof and then hoping for the best.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

We were told weeks ago by the Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, that a “world-beating” £10bn test, trace and isolate programme was on the way, which would be the key to combating flare-ups.

Then yesterday, a new rapid test for the virus was announced that will give results in 90 minutes. That’s good news, but where is all this testing? Whilst other countries in Europe have managed to get their programmes operational, ours is at best patchy.

At the same time the rapid test was announced, the Government admitted that it was pushing back the deadline for all care home staff and residents to be tested because there aren’t enough kits. Even NHS staff are not being tested regularly, despite being at heightened risk of catching the virus.

Eight months on from coronavirus arriving in Britain, there is still the sense that those running the country are struggling to set a decisive course to beat it, or at least find a way to live with it. Only two weeks ago, Boris Johnson was telling the nation that it was likely some sort of normality would be restored by Christmas. How hollow that sounds now, especially in Bradford, Calderdale and Kirklees.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Editor’s note: first and foremost - and rarely have I written down these words with more sincerity - I hope this finds you well.

Almost certainly you are here because you value the quality and the integrity of the journalism produced by The Yorkshire Post’s journalists - almost all of which live alongside you in Yorkshire, spending the wages they earn with Yorkshire businesses - who last year took this title to the industry watchdog’s Most Trusted Newspaper in Britain accolade.

And that is why I must make an urgent request of you: as advertising revenue declines, your support becomes evermore crucial to the maintenance of the journalistic standards expected of The Yorkshire Post. If you can, safely, please buy a paper or take up a subscription. We want to continue to make you proud of Yorkshire’s National Newspaper but we are going to need your help.

Postal subscription copies can be ordered by calling 0330 4030066 or by emailing [email protected]. Vouchers, to be exchanged at retail sales outlets - our newsagents need you, too - can be subscribed to by contacting subscriptions on 0330 1235950 or by visiting www.localsubsplus.co.uk where you should select The Yorkshire Post from the list of titles available.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

If you want to help right now, download our tablet app from the App / Play Stores. Every contribution you make helps to provide this county with the best regional journalism in the country.

Sincerely. Thank you.

James Mitchinson

Editor

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.