Going back to work; science trumps Boris Johnson’s rhetoric – The Yorkshire Post says

BORIS JOHNSON’S latest statement on the lifting of lockdown restrictions should be compared to the Prime Minister’s speeches in 10 Downing Street at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Boris Johnson at the latest 10 Downing Street press conference.Boris Johnson at the latest 10 Downing Street press conference.
Boris Johnson at the latest 10 Downing Street press conference.

Then, Mr Johnson was invariably flanked by Professor Chris Whitty, the Government’s chief medical officer, and Sir Patrick Vallance, the chief scientific adviser.

And it was their calm authority – and clear communication – that led to the country being so compliant with the shutting down of the economy.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Yesterday both men, and their equally respected deputies and colleagues, were absent from 10 Downing Street when the Prime Minister set out new guidance for more people to return to work.

Boris Johnson with Professor Chris Whitty (left) and Sir Patrick Vallance (right) at a Downing Street press conference in March.Boris Johnson with Professor Chris Whitty (left) and Sir Patrick Vallance (right) at a Downing Street press conference in March.
Boris Johnson with Professor Chris Whitty (left) and Sir Patrick Vallance (right) at a Downing Street press conference in March.

This is significant because it is clear that employers – and employees – are likely to take greater heed of the science, notably Sir Patrick’s assertion earlier this week that there is “absolutely no reason” to change the guidance that advises people to work from home wherever possible to help contain the virus.

It also differs from Mr Johnson’s rhetoric – namely the Government’s decision to “give employers more discretion” from August 1 – and allow staff to return work if it is deemed safe.

Yet, while both Sir Patrick and the Prime Minister couched their comments with various caveats, and recognise that each business has differing issues, Mr Johnson cannot claim to be guided by the science when the scientists no longer appear by his side at such briefings. And, far from providing clarity, the mixed messages now risk adding to the prevailing uncertainty at what is still a time of great unease for all.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Editor’s note: first and foremost - and rarely have I written down these words with more sincerity - I hope this finds you well.

Almost certainly you are here because you value the quality and the integrity of the journalism produced by The Yorkshire Post’s journalists - almost all of which live alongside you in Yorkshire, spending the wages they earn with Yorkshire businesses - who last year took this title to the industry watchdog’s Most Trusted Newspaper in Britain accolade.

And that is why I must make an urgent request of you: as advertising revenue declines, your support becomes evermore crucial to the maintenance of the journalistic standards expected of The Yorkshire Post. If you can, safely, please buy a paper or take up a subscription. We want to continue to make you proud of Yorkshire’s National Newspaper but we are going to need your help.

Postal subscription copies can be ordered by calling 0330 4030066 or by emailing [email protected]. Vouchers, to be exchanged at retail sales outlets - our newsagents need you, too - can be subscribed to by contacting subscriptions on 0330 1235950 or by visiting www.localsubsplus.co.uk where you should select The Yorkshire Post from the list of titles available.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

If you want to help right now, download our tablet app from the App / Play Stores. Every contribution you make helps to provide this county with the best regional journalism in the country.

Sincerely. Thank you.

James Mitchinson

Editor

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.