Harman hypocrisy

Yet, perversely, those at the forefront of this political cause appear unable to lead by example – and abide by the doctrines that they freely impose upon others.

These indefensible double standards are borne out by the extent to which the Labour Party circumvented its rules on all-women shortlists, one of the policies devised by Ms Harman, so her husband, Jack Dromey, could be selected as a Parliamentary candidate in a relatively safe West Midlands seat.

To compound her embarrassment, Ms Harman is strongly rebuked by a Parliamentary report, published today, for pushing through the reappointment of equalities watchdog chairman Trevor Phillips without considering, properly, the merits of other candidates.

For years, Mr Phillips has been a divisive individual. And this has been re-enforced by the turmoil at the Equality and Human Rights Commission – an amalgam of watchdogs – where six commissioners have resigned because of the body's dysfunctional management.

This should have provided the Government with ample justification for holding an "open competition" for this high profile role, which commands a generous three-year contract and an annual salary of 112,000.

The fact that Ms Harman ignored this course of action is damaging on two counts. First, it undermines the Commission's supposed independence from the Government. Presumably, she hopes Mr Phillips will make as life as difficult as possible for the Tories if they come to power.

Second, it makes a mockery of her pronouncements that more women should be appointed to the boardrooms of Britain and other senior roles. What chance do women have if the likes of Ms Harman make up the rules as they go along, and to suit their own interests?