The calculating statecraft that Boris Johnson is deploying over Brexit as populism takes hold – Matthew Flinders

Boris Johnson putting the final touches to his party conference speech - is there method behind his Brexit strategy?
Boris Johnson putting the final touches to his party conference speech - is there method behind his Brexit strategy?
Have your say

“STATECRAFT” is not a term that springs to mind when I think about Boris Johnson. So when I heard him expounding his theory that dropping out of the EU without a deal would be “a failure of statecraft for which we would all be responsible”, my political antennae started to twitch.

Put very simply, the notion of “statecraft” relates to the skilful management of the affairs of the state. It is therefore indelibly linked to the maintenance of political power through legitimate and illegitimate means.

Will Boris Johnson deliver Brexit by October 31?

Will Boris Johnson deliver Brexit by October 31?

How bludgeoning Boris Johnson is becoming an electoral liability on streets of Yorkshire – Andrew Vine

And the reference made me wonder if, despite the semblance of chaos, there is a more refined approach to statecraft going on right under our noses.

Johnson is in a pickle (not for the first time). He has set himself up as the no nonsense strong leader who would rather be “dead in a ditch” than go back to Brussels and ask for another Brexit extension.

Brexit makes this month crucial for UK and its future democracy - Bernard Ingham

Boris Johnson is focusing on domestic issues, like the NHS, ahead of an early general election.

Boris Johnson is focusing on domestic issues, like the NHS, ahead of an early general election.

The prickly problem is that Parliament has underlined that the UK is a Parliamentary state in both theory and practice by working around his prorogation to rapidly produce legislation to force him to seek a Brexit extension rather than allow a no-deal departure on October 31.

And if a Prime Minister cannot control the House of Commons, they really can’t control much at all.

Margaret Thatcher would not have sanctioned Boris Johnson’s unlawful prorogation of Parliament – Yorkshire Post Letters

What we have witnessed in recent weeks is the most amazing game of constitutional cat-and-mouse. The legislature and executive have been locked into an unedifying process of outflank and counterflank. Constitutional niceties have been cast out.

The “failure of statecraft” thesis propounded by Johnson is part of this game. Confounded by Westminster, the Prime Minister’s latest move is to try to discredit the whole system – as exemplified by his speeches and interviews at the Tory conference.

It is, of course, possible to argue that democratic politics is working. The divisions and tensions at Westminster are simply reflecting the existence of deep divides across the country.

By inflaming the narrative that politics is not working, Johnson seeks to not only place the blame for having to request an extension onto “them” (the elite, the establishment, opponents and critics, and so on) but also to frame himself as the political saviour of an ailing system that urgently requires a strong leader. In this context, nostalgia for a golden past possesses an ironic position at the heart of a vision of the future.

But is it really possibly to identify a Borisonian statecraft or is it closer to the truth to see Johnson as little more than a crafty politician?

The answer is that it is far too soon to tell. But it isn’t too soon to suggest that underneath that often bumbling and buffoon-like exterior there is, in fact, an incredibly ambitious and strategically calculating politician.

In the current context of anti-political sentiment there is a wave of anger, frustration and outrage just waiting
to be funnelled as fuel by those who are happy to engage in populist pitchfork politics.

If Johnson has a vision of successful statecraft then it is unquestionably tied to a populist strategy that does indeed seek to fuel and funnel frustration. The “failure of statecraft” narrative is simply part of this ploy.

If this is correct, then one might also legitimately ask if the strategy seems to be working. This is where Johnson may well be being far more crafty than many people appear to realise.

A focus on the day-to-day, if not hour-by-hour, minute-by-minute, constitutional games risks not being able to see the wood for the trees. The main objective for Johnson is securing a general election, and being forced to eat humble pie and request an extension, may well be a price worth paying.

Unless the opposition parties come together in a strategic alliance, which is highly unlikely, the “Remain” vote in that election is likely to be shared across a number of parties. The “Leave” vote, by contrast, will be concentrated behind the Tories, with Johnson soaking up disaffection and securing a majority. “What about the Brexit Party?” you may well ask. Johnson could well do a deal with Nigel Farage, and at the same time gain even greater control over the influx of new Tory MPs.

Populism as a mode of statecraft may actually work very well for Johnson. It’s democracy that will carry the cost.

Matthew Flinders is Professor of Politics at the University of Sheffield and is President of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom.