Why ‘levelling up’ agenda matters more than ever after virus – Jim O’Neill

ONE of the Government’s early ambitions was the idea of “levelling up” the economic prospects of Britain’s less prosperous regions.

Will social mobility improve as part of the Government's 'levelling up' agenda?

The Prime Minister, his Cabinet and senior team declared it a priority. Has Covid-19 postponed this idea, or perhaps finished it off entirely?

A pandemic of this scale and the need to respond would inevitably cause the Government to set aside its other policy aims.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

But if we have a government that can focus properly on what is necessary, and one that – in theory – doesn’t have to worry about an election for four years, “levelling up” should be back on the policy agenda.

Lord Jim O’Neill is former chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management and a former Conservative government minister.

What does “levelling up” mean?

Presumably the Government intended it to mean narrowing the inequality gap between the prosperous and the less well off.

In practice, it has been interpreted as directing helpful new economic policies at parts of the North as well as the Midlands, especially towns, rural areas and those cities that were once important mining and manufacturing centres. It was also intended to help the fortunes of formerly popular tourist resorts.

It should also relate to other parts of England, including the big urban areas, and smaller left behind areas, like those that are found in the South West.

How does the Government intend to raise school standards for all as part of its 'levelling up' agenda?

There are different ways to look at the notion of “levelling up”. Does it mean levelling up incomes, or does it mean levelling up in terms of wealth more broadly?

What about housing availability and house prices? And what about the levelling up of opportunities, especially in relation to education for the less advantaged?

Here’s what levelling up should now mean, especially in a post Covid-19 environment. Perhaps Britain’s most obvious deficiency is its second rate telecommunications system.

As evidenced by the persistent challenges of our Covid-19 testing capabilities, and now the rollout of the trace and testing strategy, the UK simply isn’t in the premier league of modern technological tools.

One of the reasons why South Korea has coped so much better than us, and many others, is the mass availability of modern technologies to all their people.

This is why they, and many of the other countries that score best in a league table of the lowest deaths to population ratio, are also countries that score best on indices for long term, sustainable (and inclusive) growth.

The Government must now weigh the importance of widespread broadband and many other technologies to everyone, otherwise we will remain in the second division of productivity, wealth generation, and we will be left vulnerable to the next pandemic.

Presumably within the NHS, the role of technology and diagnostics will be permanently enhanced, which is crucial for the ongoing battle against antimicrobial resistance, as well as many other health challenges.

On pre-tax incomes, the Government should pursue its policy of raising the minimum and living wage, which is the most direct and effective method of narrowing income equality.

It also might result in a shift in thinking from business owners and leaders towards investment spending, and encourage them to consider investing in capital as opposed to labour.

On house prices, the Government should abandon its general caution on social housing. It should significantly boost it.

In terms of the levelling up of opportunities, the Government needs to take a new approach to education and skills.

While it seems so wedded to the Academy system, it must stop this from limiting other important initiatives, especially for those in pockets of greater disadvantage.

Alternatives to academies, and perhaps much stronger, more committed versions of the so-called Opportunity Areas, must be pursued.

Projects such as Right to Succeed, and those initiated by SHINE (of which I am a trustee), should be given much stronger support, with more areas of disadvantage chosen.

On skills, especially in the post Covid-19 environment with the big challenges now facing our universities, perhaps the Government should use this opportunity to move away from the broad approach put in place by the Blair government.

Instead, it should convert many tertiary institutions back to something more like polytechnics, offering proper skills-based forms of tertiary education. This would allow a somewhat smaller aggregate number of universities to continue flourishing.

On geographical levelling up, 
the Government needs to pursue strong, radical policies essentially forgotten since they were tentatively introduced in the Cameron and Osborne days. These urged greater devolution, and emphasised the development of skills. Ultimately, 
why not devolve spending and 
taxation, as in some other successful countries?

The Government should establish regional investment funds, where
their primary purpose is to provide equity-type finance to allow their unique assets to become successful businesses which, in turn, can compete globally and create higher productivity jobs for people in those areas.

In the North, for example, advanced manufacturing, alternative modern energies and life sciences are three areas that would be especially well positioned.

There are, of course, many other areas where levelling up polices may be applicable, including infrastructure projects such as train systems and bus routes.

What is clear is that genuine levelling up is now even more important than it might have seemed back in December.

Lord Jim O’Neill is former chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management and a former Conservative government Minister.

Editor’s note: first and foremost - and rarely have I written down these words with more sincerity - I hope this finds you well.

Almost certainly you are here because you value the quality and the integrity of the journalism produced by The Yorkshire Post’s journalists - almost all of which live alongside you in Yorkshire, spending the wages they earn with Yorkshire businesses - who last year took this title to the industry watchdog’s Most Trusted Newspaper in Britain accolade.

And that is why I must make an urgent request of you: as advertising revenue declines, your support becomes evermore crucial to the maintenance of the journalistic standards expected of The Yorkshire Post. If you can, safely, please buy a paper or take up a subscription. We want to continue to make you proud of Yorkshire’s National Newspaper but we are going to need your help.

Postal subscription copies can be ordered by calling 0330 4030066 or by emailing [email protected] Vouchers, to be exchanged at retail sales outlets - our newsagents need you, too - can be subscribed to by contacting subscriptions on 0330 1235950 or by visiting www.localsubsplus.co.uk where you should select The Yorkshire Post from the list of titles available.

If you want to help right now, download our tablet app from the App / Play Stores. Every contribution you make helps to provide this county with the best regional journalism in the country.

Sincerely. Thank you.

James Mitchinson

Editor