Why Russia’s invasion of Ukraine should not be viewed in terms of just secular politics - Nicholas Baines
Putin is not just a politician who wields power without really knowing what he wants to do with it. It has been said of certain Prime Ministers that they wanted to be PM, but didn’t know what for.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThis has never been the case for the ex-KGB officer who described the end of the Soviet Union as a ‘catastrophe’. There are two powerful drivers of his political ambitions: religious myth (rooted in a perceived historical integrity) and grievance. In the West the former has been grievously misunderstood in the last three decades since the latter radically motivated his decision-making.
Every time he leaves his bubble in the Kremlin, Putin passes the statue of Vladimir the Great who, according to one reading of history, established ‘Holy Russia’ in 988AD, uniting what we now know as Russia, Ukraine and Belarus.
The patriarchate – religion and politics were inseparable – was begun in Kyiv and only much later transferred to Moscow. Putin sees himself as the latest and greatest Vladimir who is destined to bring back together the three elements of Holy Russia which have been disintegrated by a Ukraine that had no right under God in declaring any sort of independence.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThis is why Putin is supported uncritically by the Patriarch of Moscow in his war on Ukraine. There is a bigger prize to play for: not just an expedient political settlement for the here and now, but, rather, the fulfilment of a divine destiny for which he is the primary agent of delivery. To think about this conflict simply in terms of secular politics or events of the last century is to miss the deeper reality.
The reason Putin grieves the collapse of the USSR between 1989-1991 is not merely down to some offended nostalgia. While the Soviet Empire survived, the elements of Holy Russia were essentially held together in a single entity. To use a biblical image from the gospels, when it fell apart and left a vacuum, the demons came pouring in and occupied the space. Hence, it is not wrong to describe Putin’s motivation for prosecuting the current war as righting a wrong in the name of God.
However, understanding this does not lead automatically to a solution that guarantees a safer and more peaceful future. For Russia the rupture between the elements of Holy Russia will forever be an igniter of collective psychic grievance and actual violence. A short-term resolution of the current conflict will not decide forever the question of Ukraine’s identity – as a people, a nation or a race. That is why these current horrors will not answer the ultimate question.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe West has responded resolutely, confounding Putin’s assumption that we don’t believe anything enough to pay a price.
However, the original rationale behind the West’s response was purely to enable Ukraine to defend itself against military aggression. That is now beginning to creep into enabling Russia to be defeated. These are different goals – even if you think that Russia’s defeat is essential. How the move from ‘enabling defence’ to ‘defeating the enemy’ is handled will be vital as the uncertainties of other factors proceed.
It is hard to believe now that only one year ago the West thought it highly unlikely that Putin would launch an invasion – even while he was amassing troops and armour on the border of Ukraine.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdSince that fateful day in February 2022 millions of refugees have fled the country as Russia’s military devastated Ukraine’s infrastructure, flattened its buildings, butchered its people, internally censored all media, stamped on any dissent, and wantonly committed what can only be described as crimes against humanity.
Any respect for the rule of law is dead – which is why it remains so important for even suggestions of breaching international law by our own governments to be opposed at source.
This war will not be over soon. Refugees might decide to stay in the countries where they have settled, and that will change local communities.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe cost militarily and economically will continue to grow (as demands expand), as will the cost in human lives and critical infrastructure – the cost of rebuilding Ukraine one day will be enormous.
But, for today, we must continue to hear and tell the truth, be realistic about the potential for peace, continue to work and pray for those impacted most severely, and look further back and further forward than we in the West are sometimes wont to do.
Rt Revd Nicholas Baines, Bishop of Leeds, is a former Soviet specialist at GCHQ in Cheltenham and current lead bishop for international affairs in the House of Lords.