Students denied the genuine university experience – Yorkshire Post Letters

From: Dr A Cook, Austwick.
A sign in the window of the student accommodation at an university in lockdown.A sign in the window of the student accommodation at an university in lockdown.
A sign in the window of the student accommodation at an university in lockdown.

IT seems to me that Penelope Helbest (The Yorkshire Post, October 6) stands in little need of a university education.

She is not the only one who finds Government – I use the word loosely – “advice” incomprehensible and about 
as stable as a jelly in an earthquake. Heavens, they 
can’t even remember it themselves!

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

She also expresses to a nicety my deep unease with the treatment to which the present generation of undergraduates is being subjected.

University students in lockdown stand by a widow in their halls of residence.University students in lockdown stand by a widow in their halls of residence.
University students in lockdown stand by a widow in their halls of residence.

They are charged, in advance, a great deal of money for their “privilege” and then denied all of the fundamental rights of the young to mix and mingle as they choose. In my experience – it was very long ago for me – less than 50 per cent of a university education is provided directly by the institution.

A great deal more is provided by direct interaction with fellow students: discussions, rows, arguments etc on the subject of life, the universe and everything – perhaps even the subject of study! If you substitute the non-academic learning process for functional imprisonment, there is no ‘‘university experience’’ to speak of and young people will have been grossly defrauded.

While such might be acceptable elsewhere in the world, it is an insult to the intelligence here.

From: Michael Green, Baghill Green, Tingley.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

I FIND myself in complete agreement with Simon Clarke MP when, writing about local lockdowns, he refers (The Yorkshire Post, October 2) to “the growing risk that tighter restrictions will punish the law-abiding”.

But this problem is not peculiar to coronavirus. Public authorities have long taken the view that only thing they need to do to solve a problem is to impose legal restrictions on people.

And then, when faced with the fact that some people don’t comply, they impose even tighter restrictions. This has long been the case with speed limits. A proportion of people insist on driving at 40mph (or more) in a residential 30mph zone. So the limit is reduced to 20mph. All that does is penalise the majority who obeyed the law. It makes no difference to the people doing 40, because they go on doing so.

That is the attitude adopted by Leeds City Council, among others. And that is one of the reasons why I find it difficult to share the general enthusiasm for giving councils powers to decide on local coronavirus restrictions.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Because, on their track record, they simply can’t be trusted.

Support The Yorkshire Post and become a subscriber today.

Your subscription will help us to continue to bring quality news to the people of Yorkshire. In return, you’ll see fewer ads on site, get free access to our app and receive exclusive members-only offers.

So, please - if you can - pay for our work. Just £5 per month is the starting point. If you think that which we are trying to achieve is worth more, you can pay us what you think we are worth. By doing so, you will be investing in something that is becoming increasingly rare. Independent journalism that cares less about right and left and more about right and wrong. Journalism you can trust.

Thank you

James Mitchinson

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.