SHARES in Royal Mail rose by more than a third when they began trading on the stock market today, increasing the value of the business by more than £1 billion.
The sharp rise of 36% from the 330p offer price to as much as 450p meant 690,000 ordinary investors who have each bought around £750-worth of stock gained more than £270 each.
The Government announced yesterday that 95% of all applicants for the heavily-oversubscribed offer had picked up stock.
Shares were sold at the top end of the price range set by the Government, valuing the company at £3.3 billion, but a rise to 450p implies an increase to £4.5 billion.
The surging price is likely to renew claims that ministers have sold off public assets too cheaply. The privatisation of a 52.2% stake in Royal Mail has initially raised £1.72 billion for the Treasury.
Last night the Government said that all retail investors who applied for between the £750 minimum allocation and £10,000-worth would receive a tranche of 227 shares worth £749.10.
But many hoping for a bigger slice of the company were left disappointed after retail investors who applied for more than £10,000-worth got none after the offer was seven times oversubscribed.
A third of the sold-off stake - excluding a 10% chunk being given free to 150,000 Royal Mail staff - has been allocated to the general public.
The remainder has gone to big institutional investors such as pension funds, insurers and hedge funds. The institutional offer was more than 20 times over-subscribed.
Taxpayers have been left with a 37.8% stake in the company, although this could be reduced to 30% depending on a so-called “over-allotment” option, which is dependent on price performance following the flotation.
Business Secretary Vince Cable said that the sell-off was a “very good deal” for Royal Mail workers, for the country and for the Government.
He dismissed suggestions that the sharp rise in Royal Mail share prices proved the company was undervalued.
“You get an enormous amount of froth and speculation in the aftermath of a big IPO of this kind,” Mr Cable told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. “It is of absolutely no significance whatsoever.
“What matters is where the price eventually settles. If we look back at this in three months or six months’ time or years to come, that’s what we are really interested in.
“The bulk of the shares have gone to long-term institutional investors, stable investors, some overseas investors but mainly British pension funds and insurance companies who are there for the long term.
“The objective of the exercise, which fits in with what we want for the Royal Mail, is to make sure it has stable, long-term investors.”
He added: “From the point of view of the Royal Mail, we are interested in helping this institution to survive and compete in a very difficult market. They have lost a lot of their business because of email. They have got to raise a lot of private capital in order to invest.
“They could only do this from private markets. They can’t get the money from Government, so that’s why we have had to do this privatisation.”
But the general secretary of the Communication Workers Union, Billy Hayes, described the sell-off as “a tragedy” and predicted that it would make “not one scintilla of difference” to employees’ intention to vote for strike action next week.
Mr Hayes told Today: “This is a sham, really. The company has been under-valued... It’s basically David Cameron rewarding his mates in the City. Vince Cable, one of the cleverest men in British politics, has made one of the stupidest decisions he is ever likely to make as a politician.
“It’s a tragedy. This company is nearly 500 years old and it’s being privatised for no reason.”
Mr Hayes acknowledged that the vast majority of Royal Mail staff have accepted shares in the privatised company, but said that this did not reflect enthusiasm for the new arrangements.
“I don’t know anyone in austerity Britain who is going to refuse free money,” he said. “They’ve been given these free shares, but the real test of whether the staff are happy with this privatisation will be next Wednesday, when we expect to declare a Yes vote for strike action to defend their terms and conditions.
“There’s no celebrations in delivery offices round the country today. There’s a real fear that privatisation will lead to what’s happened in other utilities that have been privatised - things getting worse, reduced services and higher prices for the consumer.”
Asked whether Royal Mail staff would “take the money, then go on strike”, Mr Hayes replied: “Yeah, why not?”
Mr Cable said that all but around 150 of the Royal Mail’s 150,000 staff had taken up the offer of shares in the company, which would now be worth around £2,000 for each worker.
“It is locking them in,” he said. “Their future is tied in very much with the success of these shares.”
Asked if he believed Royal Mail staff would vote to strike next week, the Business Secretary said: “That is their choice. We have maintained a dialogue with them. I and my colleague Michael Fallon have regularly talked with Billy Hayes and his people and tried to persuade them. They are not persuaded, but I think they will acknowledge in future that we have got the best future for the Royal Mail.
“It is giving it a future. It will now be able to compete. They have shares which are quite valuable. Only a handful - just over 150 out of 150,000 - have declined to take these shares, which suggests that they regard them as valuable.
“Overall, this is a very good deal for them, for the country, for the Government. We get value for money, and I think that judgment will be borne out in time.”
Mr Hayes raised concerns that a portion of the Royal Mail is now owned by overseas investors.
“We won’t be celebrating the fact that we have got these sovereign wealth funds,” said the CWU leader. “We understand that Kuwait has bought shares in Royal Mail, and Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund. We are going to have a situation where the royal family in Kuwait have more influence over the postal service in the UK than the royal family in this country. It’s ridiculous.”
But Mr Cable described his comment as “completely meaningless”.
“I think he is talking about the Kuwait Investment Fund, which has nothing to do with the royal family,” said the Business Secretary. “It is a long-term investment institution which is very active in share markets in the UK and is a good investor. They invest long-term. They are not fly-by-night investors.”