RSPCA calls for urgent changes to '˜flawed' Dangerous Dogs Act
Breed Specific Legislation: A Dog’s Dinner is the comprehensive study on the controversial act which was introduced 25 years ago this week.
However, the number of dog bites continues to increase and of the 30 people killed by pets, 21 were by breeds not banned under the act.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe RSPCA has dubbed it a “flawed law” and called for a new approach.
It claims that on top of ethical and welfare issues, there is added emotional strain placed on the charity staff who are forced by law to put certain animals to sleep because of the way they look.
Under Section 1 of the act, there are four breeds banned - Japanese Tosa, Fila Brasileiro, Dogo Argentino and Pitbull Terrier - as well as crossbreeds which have Pitbull-type features.
Over the past two years, the RSPCA has been forced to put 366 dogs to sleep. Battersea Dogs Home, which has been equally critical of the law, has put down 91 dogs in the past 12 months.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdToday’s report illustrates the weaknesses in breed specific legislation, which has failed to meet its goals of improving public safety by reducing the number of dog bites and eliminating prohibited breeds, according to the RSPCA.
The charity found that more dog bites are reported than ever before and the number of banned dogs continues to rise.
In Canada, dog bites have decreased due to a focus on improving responsible dog ownership.
The report concludes that the DDA is a failed law with “unintended negative consequences for dog welfare”.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe charity wants Section 1 repealed with resources diverted to Section 3, which targets owners who have a dog which is “dangerously out of control” and the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing.
It has called for a new, three-pronged approach - educating children, effective legislation for problem owners, and more research to provide a better understanding of why dogs bite.
Dr Samantha Gaines, RSPCA dog welfare expert, said: “The police, the RSPCA, and other animal rescue organisations have to deal with the consequences of this flawed law by euthanising hundreds of dogs because legislation is forcing us to due to the way they look, despite being suitable for rehoming.
“Not only is this a huge ethical and welfare issue, it also places significant emotional strain on staff.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“It is the view of the RSPCA, and the public, that every animal’s life matters.
“We conclude that breed-specific legislation has not achieved its objectives whilst causing unintended harms - a new approach is required.
“The RSPCA believes it is paramount for the Government to launch an inquiry into the effectiveness of BSL, assess other options to improve human safety and dog welfare, and ultimately repeal the breed specific part of the legislation.
Case Study
Sarah Anderson, from East Sussex, had to watch vets put to sleep her 24 puppies and two dogs because of the Dangerous Dogs Act.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdShe had taken on two dogs from the same litter as her other dog, believing they were Staffie cross American bulldogs.
The two dogs - Annie and Maisie - later gave birth to 26 puppies with 24 surviving.
However, when Sarah took Maisie to the vets with a leg injury, the police were contacted on suspicion of her being a banned breed.
Both of the 18-month-old pets were put to sleep under Section 1 of the Dangerous Dogs Act - as were all of the puppies who were less than six weeks old.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdSarah said: “I blame myself for the death of my girls but I refuse to let them die for nothing.
“Back in 2008 I was ignorant as to how many dogs ended up in rescues and was one of the selfish people who decided to let my bitches have a litter before getting them neutered.
“I was devastated, haunted by the thought of those babies dying. I didn’t know the law so I took the pups to the vets, and my two friends and I cuddled them while the vet went around giving them the injection. I was sobbing.
“He proceeded to put to sleep 24 innocent babies only born because of my innocence and stupidity.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“I live with that everyday and, no matter how much I suffer, I cannot stop punishing myself.
“My head was reeling and I was begging them not to take my dogs but allow them to live. My world was falling apart.
“I remember sitting in the waiting room at the vets with them - who do you choose to die first?
“I took Annie in, she was scared of her leg being shaved, but showed no aggression. I remember holding her limp lifeless body and screaming, my heart was being ripped out, she’d done nothing wrong. I left with just her lead and collar.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“Then I went back in with Maisie. I sat, cuddling her, and she died wagging her tail. The pain of losing them is something I’ve never felt before or since. I relive it over and over again and the guilt eats me up inside.
“I don’t want anybody to suffer like I have, or for any innocent dog to be destroyed for no reason.
“BSL [breed specific legislation] destroys the lives of dogs and their families. Dogs aren’t born aggressive, they become a product of their environment and those that own them.
“I would like, more than anything, to see BSL changed or totally abolished.”
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdJack the pitbull has no teeth due to the stress he suffered after police seized him for being a banned breed.
The friendly animal had been kept in kennels by authorities for two years - leading him to over groom his front legs which resulted in sore patches.
During this period, Jack’s previous owners don’t believe he was walked and he constantly chewed the bars of the kennel - breaking all of his teeth.
But the seven-year-old dog was saved from a death sentence by Allie Green, who is part of the Draconian Dogs Act group.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdMrs Green applied to be Jack’s keeper and showed she could look after him. He now lives with her family in Horsham, Sussex.
Allie said: “He still has to be muzzled, by law, but he couldn’t bite even if he wanted to.
“Even a game of fetch, which he loves, is a challenge as he cannot hold the ball.
“It breaks my heart to muzzle him. He doesn’t like it at all. Jack doesn’t enjoy going out. Despite intensive work, going out with the muzzle on is a massive issue.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“BSL has failed to protect anyone. IT has resulted in the deaths of thousands of dogs, cost millions in taxpayers’ money, and will never achieve its aim.
“It needs to be repealed and replaced with legislation that ensures the right dog is in the right environment with the right owner.”