Sheffield: '˜Council leaders put profit ahead of city trees'

Sheffield City Council has been influenced by 'corporate and business responsibilities' in felling thousands of healthy trees despite widespread protests, a court heard.

Leeds Crown Court.

The claims were made yesterday on the first day of a High Court hearing in which the local authority is seeking injunctions against three people.

The legal action comes over continued protests against tree felling as part of the council’s £2bn Streets Ahead contract with Amey.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

The council is seeking permanent injunctions against the defendants and ‘persons unknown’ at the trial, which is expected to last three days.

It says campaigners are protesting inside safety barriers ‘unlawfully’ and as a result holding up work, which is costing the taxpayer money.

If the campaigners are served with injunctions and break them they will be in contempt of court, and could face fines or prison.

The local authority’s barrister David Fosdick, QC, said: “These proceedings are about bringing an end to a campaign of direct action, not about preventing peaceful protests on the highway.

“From the outset the council must emphasise the essential distinction between peaceful protest and unlawful direct action.

“They (the defendants) say because it is peaceful, it is lawful. That is simply wrong.”

He added: “It is a fundamental affront to the rule of law.”

John Cooper QC, for the defendants, said the case was not just about the council’s decision to pull down thousands of healthy trees but the burden the local authority had been placed under by entering into a PFI contract with Amey. He added: “They have been influenced by a corporate and business responsibility, as led by the PFI contract.”

Mr Cooper said it was the defendants’ case that the council had felled trees as it was the most profitable option under the contract and they failed to explore other alternatives to chopping them down. Mr Cooper said: “The position of the defendants here is that they are protesting against the unlawful felling of healthy trees on the basis that the council are acting illegally.

“They dispute that they are committing a disruption, nuisance or have committed any criminal offences. Any arrests that have been made have been rescinded and the police have made it clear... that they want nothing to do with this matter on any side.”

The council initially sought injunctions against eight people. The figure is now down to three defendants – Alison Teal, Green Party councillor for Nether Edge and Sharrow, Calvin Payne and Dave Dillner.

Mr Cooper said the five other defendants had now signed undertakings and would not contest the matter in court. He said they had only agreed to sign the undertakings because of the potential legal costs of up to £100,000. Mr Cooper added: “They are anxious to make that clear.”

The hearing continues today.

One of the defendants and a senior council officer gave evidence on day one of the hearing.

Councillor Alison Teal told the court that she had been contacted by hundreds of people in her ward who had concerns about tree felling.

She said: “It is absolutely astonishing how many trees we have lost, most of them unnecessarily. There are alternatives.”

Paul Billington, Sheffield City Council’s head of highways, told the court that legal action had been taken as a “last resort”.

Mr Billington said the direct action meant the council was now struggling to meet target dates for completing work.