Thousands of MoD jobs go in ‘bolt from blue’

Union leaders have attacked plans by the Ministry of Defence to cut a further 7,000 civilian posts as “shameful”.

The Public and Commercial Services union (PCS) said it was “totally unreasonable” for the MoD to be cutting so many posts when efforts were still being made to reduce a previously announced cull of 25,000 jobs.

Officials said they had met Defence Secretary Liam Fox several times in recent months after the Government’s strategic defence and security review proposed axing 25,000 civilian and 17,000 military jobs.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Staff were expected to be sent a letter yesterday from the MoD saying that further job reductions will have to be made.

PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka said cutting so many civilian and military jobs could put lives at risk, adding: “This is a shameful way to treat anybody, far less the people who serve on the front line, and those who support them.

“Since the defence review announcement in October, PCS has been thwarted at every turn in our attempts to find out where these cuts will be made and what impact it will have on the front line.

“How can the MoD announce more job cuts when they have no idea how they will run the department just now?

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“PCS has been working on a coherent programme for defence that identifies and reduces waste, frees up service personnel to serve in the front line by civilianising non-essential military posts and eliminating unnecessary external expenditure.

“According the MoD’s own records, they spend approximately £6bn per annum on external expenditure such as consultants.”

An MoD spokesman said: “The Government has tackled the £38bn black hole in the MoD’s finances, delivering substantial savings through difficult but necessary decisions.

“The aim of these cost savings is to ensure that the maximum funding is available for the front line.

Steve Jary, national officer of the Prospect union, said: “This announcement is a bolt out of the blue and staff will rightly be appalled at how the department has gone about the process.”

Related topics: