Hague defends asylum for Gaddafi deputy
Mr Hague admitted there were “issues” over how to handle the defector, but stressed that Mr Kusa’s decision to abandon Colonel Muammar Gaddafi had “weakened” the regime.
He also signalled that police would be allowed to interview Mr Kusa about the Lockerbie bombing and other crimes, saying: “We want more information about past events.”
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe comments came amid claims that Col Gaddafi’s right-hand man was offered asylum in the UK as an enticement to leave Libya last week – raising the prospect of British taxpayers having to millions of punds for his security bill.
The Foreign Office refused to comment on the suggestion, saying only that Mr Kusa would be “entitled to apply for asylum”.
But Tory MP Ben Wallace, parliamentary aide to Justice Secretary Ken Clarke, told a Sunday newspaper: “This man should not be granted asylum or any other special treatment. The only proper outcome is to bring him to justice.
“Britain needs to make up its mind quickly. There will be no shortage of courts that will readily seek his extradition.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“The last thing the UK wants is for Kusa to languish, at taxpayers’ expense, in legal no-man’s-land.”
The potential for a “domino effect” from Mr Kusa’s defection was highlighted yesterday evening by reports that his deputy Abdulati al Obeidi has fled to Athens.
Mr Hague, MP for Richmond, declined to say whether Mr Kusa had been contacting ex-colleagues urging them to follow his example.
But he mounted a robust defence of the decision to allow him into Britain, stressing that there had been “no deal” offering immunity.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“I think that when someone like that says they want to get out it would be quite wrong to say no, you have got to stay there,” he told the BBC’s Andrew Marr show.
“The Crown Office in Scotland want to talk to him about what has happened in the past, such as Lockerbie.
“My officials are discussing with the Crown Office tomorrow how to go about that.
“That is not a bad thing either. We want more information about past events.”
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdDespite the rebels showing no sign of making headway against Col Gaddafi’s better armed and trained forces, Mr Hague dismissed the prospect of ground troops being sent in.
And he indicated he did not believe that the conflict would end in a stalemate. “Let’s be clear, if the Libyan regime tries to hang on in this situation, they are internationally isolated, they can’t sell any oil,” he said.
“There is no future for Libya on that basis, and so I think even the prospect of stalemate should encourage people in Tripoli to think, ‘Well, Gaddafi has now got to go’.”
The Foreign Office disclosed that a team led by experienced diplomat Christopher Prentice had arrived in Benghazi on Saturday to forge links with the opposition.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe move follows the embarrassing episode last month when a UK group was briefly detained by rebels after turning up uninvited at dead of night in a helicopter.
A spokesman said: “It will build on the work of the previous team and seek to establish further information about the Interim National Council, its aims and more broadly what is happening in Libya.”
Meanwhile, Archbishop Desmond Tutu – a long-term critic of Col Gaddafi – suggested it might be “the lesser of two evils” to offer the dictator immunity.
“I would say, as I have just said now, you keep having to balance what is a lesser evil,” he said. “I feel that in the best of worlds, it would be the best thing to say that you clobber him, capture him and let him stand for trial.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“But we know that doesn’t usually happen in the world in which we inhabit and say what is the lesser of two evils – to let him have a soft landing and save the lives of as many people as we possibly can.”