More than 800 complaints over Sun’s naked pictures of Harry

More than 850 complaints have been made to the Press watchdog about naked photographs of Prince Harry that were published in yesterday’s Sun.

The tabloid became the first British newspaper to carry the pictures, arguing the move was in the public interest and a “crucial” test of the country’s free press.

The Press Complaints Commission (PCC) said all the complaints it has received came from members of the public and none had come from St James’s Palace or any other representatives of the royal.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Nearly all of the complaints are about invasion of privacy and are to be investigated in due course.

The Palace said it had no further comment on the matter after previously saying that it was down to the editors of Britain’s newspapers to decide whether they printed the controversial pictures.

A Palace spokesman added: “We have made our views on Prince Harry’s privacy known. Newspapers regulate themselves, so the publication of the photographs is ultimately a decision for editors to make.”

The Palace said Harry, 27, an Army officer and Apache helicopter pilot, remains on a period of leave and will return to his military duties shortly. He does not have any public engagements within the coming days.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The pictures of him frolicking in the nude with an unnamed woman while on holiday in Las Vegas made headlines around the world but until yesterday no papers in the UK had used them following a request from St James’s Palace, made via the PCC, to respect Harry’s privacy.

But The Sun said it printed them in yesterday’s edition so the millions of people who get their news in print or have no internet access could “take a full part in that national conversation”.

One of the two naked images of the royal is splashed across the front page, just a day after the publication got a member of staff to pose for its front page in a mock-up.

In the picture, the royal can be seen wearing just a necklace and a wristband with his hands around his genitals as a seemingly topless woman stands close behind him.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The front page carries the headline: “Heir it is!” with an editorial explaining the reasons behind their decision to print it, describing it as “vital” that the paper ran the pictures.

The editorial said: “The Prince Harry pictures are a crucial test of Britain’s free Press. It is absurd that in the internet age newspapers like The Sun could be stopped from publishing stories and pictures already seen by millions on the free-for-all that is the web.”

The other photo, which shows the nude prince shielding himself behind an unknown woman who is also naked, with his bare bottom facing the camera, is also printed within the Rupert Murdoch-owned tabloid.

The Sun managing editor David Dinsmore said the paper had “thought long and hard” about whether to use the pictures and said it was an issue of freedom of the Press rather than because it was moralising about Harry’s actions.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

He told the BBC’s Radio 5 Live that The Sun did generally “fear” the PCC, but a decision had been made to publish the photos because of the public interest.

He said: “These are pictures that are now in the public domain in every country of the world.

“Hundreds of millions of people have seen these pictures on 
the internet and it seems 
perverse that they shouldn’t be shown on the pages of our newspapers.”

Until yesterday, to see the images the British public had to use the US-based celebrity gossip website TMZ that broke the story, or other internet sites.

Former deputy prime minister Lord Prescott said the newspaper had shown “absolute utter contempt” for the law and the Leveson Inquiry.

“It is not about privacy. It is about money, money, money.”