Potter plagiarism claim struck out as deadline missed

A CLAIM that Harry Potter author JK Rowling lifted the plot of one of her books from the work of another writer has been struck out after the claimant failed to meet a deadline for paying the first stage of £1.5m into court as security for costs.

The Court of Appeal ordered last week that the claimant, Paul Allen, trustee of the estate of Adrian Jacobs, who died in 1997, should pay the first section of the money into court by 4pm on Friday last week.

The claim has now failed as no payment was made to the court.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The move marks the end of a bitterly fought battle in which Ms Rowling was accused of having lifted the plot of fourth in the series – Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire – from Mr Jacobs’ book, Willy the Wizard.

She and her publisher, Bloomsbury, had faced a demand for more than one billion Australian dollars – £659m – in damages.

Solicitor David Hooper, a partner with law firm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain, which represented Bloomsbury, said: “They have not paid the money into court.

“The whole thing is a scandal – it has been going on for seven years. It was an absolutely ludicrous case.”

The claimants had spent well over £1m, he said.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Ms Rowling has described the claim that her book was copied from Willy the Wizard as “not only unfounded but absurd”, and said she had never even seen the book until Mr Allen’s claim was launched in 2004.

Her solicitor, Gideon Benaim, a partner at law firm Schillings, said: “An enormous amount of time has been wasted having to defend against this claim, when it was quite obvious to us from the outset that it had no chance of success.

“As the judge noted, those behind the claim set about publicising the case with a view to exerting pressure and promoting their ‘book’. Quite how they ever thought that we would succumb to pressure indicates a complete lack of understanding on their part. We are glad that the substantive action is now at an end.”

Mr Justice Kitchin ordered the payment into court in March, saying that Mr Allen should pay security for 65 per cent of the costs faced by Ms Rowling and her publisher, Bloomsbury.

Related topics: