Knox defends refusal to face murder retrial

Amanda Knox has defended her decision not to return to Italy to face retrial over the murder of British student Meredith Kercher.
Amanda Knox. Below: Meredith Kercher.Amanda Knox. Below: Meredith Kercher.
Amanda Knox. Below: Meredith Kercher.

The 26-year-old American said she was trying to rebuild her life after the “ultimate nightmare” of being wrongfully convicted and imprisoned over the killing of Leeds University student Ms Kercher in November 2007.

“I have plenty to fear because I was already imprisoned wrongfully, I was already convicted wrongfully and this is everything to fear, this, as an innocent person, is the ultimate nightmare, this does not make sense,” she told ITV’s Daybreak.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Ms Knox has denied any involvement in the killing of Ms Kercher, who was found with her throat slashed in the bedroom of the house they shared in Perugia, central Italy.

Meredith Kercher.Meredith Kercher.
Meredith Kercher.

She was convicted along with her Italian former boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito following a high-profile trial, but the pair were later cleared in 2011 after an appeal court found the prosecution lacking and criticised large swathes of the case against them.

Italy’s supreme court has ordered a new trial but Miss Knox, who now lives in Seattle, has said she will not attend for several reasons, including being unable to afford to travel to Italy and remain in the country for a retrial.

Mr Sollecito, 29, has denied any involvement in the killing and has appealed for money to fund his defence when a retrial starts next Monday.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Miss Knox explained why she would not be going back to Italy: “One of the major reasons is because I have done this, I have given testimony ... I can’t financially afford to be going back and forth to Italy.

“I am in school, I am trying to rebuild my life. Then there is the very real fact that I was imprisoned wrongfully and I cannot reconcile that experience with the choice of going back. It doesn’t make sense.

“This isn’t a complicated case. It has been resolved and for people to hold on to circumstantial things that have been proven wrong... At the very beginning, I never had a chance to defend myself. Over the course of the trial, it was shown that I wasn’t the monster that was being made of me.”

She added: “There is proof of my innocence in there being no trace of me in the room where my friend was murdered.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“There was no reason for me to have done this, there is nothing that is a part of me that would ever do something like this.

“It is so scary to have go to through this again, I did not expect this to happen.

“And now I am not sure what to expect because I have two different experiences – I was wrongfully convicted and rightly acquitted for being innocent and now I have to hope that the next court is able to look at this without prejudice and realise that there is proof of my innocence here.

“This isn’t a case about a character, this isn’t a case about a femme fatale, this is a case about my friend who was brutally murdered as she just happened to be home that night.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Ms Knox said she had been made to feel like she was being hunted.

“I’ve been hunted. I’m being hunted down,” she said. “And I’m trying to fight back now that I have the opportunity.”

She said she would like Ms Kercher’s family to take her to visit her grave and believes that they can help one another with the grieving.

“The greatest closure is for them to be willing to take me to her grave. I never had a chance to see them before I was already called the murderer,” she said.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Ms Knox denied she had tried to cash in on Ms Kercher’s death by writing her book, Waiting To Be Heard, which was published in the United States earlier this year, and said all the proceeds had gone on paying back her parents and lawyers.

“I am not sitting on a yacht somewhere – that’s not the case,” she said.

Related topics: