Police ‘kettling’ tactic unlawful says High Court

THE police use of the controversial “kettling” tactic during the G20 protests in London was unlawful, the High Court has ruled.

The judgment led to a call from human rights lawyers for an immediate change to police attitudes and the tactic of kettling in which a tight police cordon is thrown round demonstrators keeping them trapped in one place for several hours.

But the Metropolitan Police expressed concern over the impact of the ruling on its ability “to prevent disorder within protests” and said they plan to appeal.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The judgment was a victory for Hannah McClure, a student, and Josh Moos, a campaigner for Plane Stupid, who had challenged the legality of the “violent” restraint methods used against them at the Camp for Climate Action in Bishopsgate on April 1, 2009.

It was the day newspaper seller Ian Tomlinson died after being struck by a police officer at a separate G20 protest at the nearby Royal Exchange.

The police had sought to justify imposing the kettle from just after 7pm for more than four hours at the climate camp, saying they feared violent demonstrators at the Royal Exchange would “hijack” the more peaceful climate camp.

But the High Court ruled there had been no evidence of an imminent breach of the peace to justify the tactic.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The judges criticised “unduly inflexible” arrangements for releasing people contained within it. Moos said he became dehydrated after being refused permission to leave.

The judges specifically condemned the Metropolitan Police over the way officers armed with batons and riot shields pushed a 15-deep crowd of demonstrators back some 20m-30m.

Sir Anthony May, who is president of the Queen’s Bench Division, and Mr Justice Sweeney said “unjustified force” had been used.

The judges also said the Met “policy and training” about the use of riot shields to push and strike “appeared to be insufficient”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

They declared: “There needed to be clear-cut instructions as to whether shield strikes were ever justified and, if so, when.”

John Halford, of Bindmans solicitors, who acted for McClure and Moos, said later: “The court has roundly condemned the unlawful and oppressive police response, exposing it as unacceptable in a democratic society.

“To date, there have been few signs of a change in police attitudes and tactics since G20. This judgment could not give a clearer signal that that must happen immediately.”

The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) announced it would appeal against yesterday’s judgment, saying: “Where necessary, we will continue to use containment as a last resort to prevent serious disorder and violence. The MPS believes that the Bishopsgate containment prevented further scenes of violence and criminal damage occurring on 1 April, 2009.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Jenny Jones, a member of the Metropolitan Police Authority, said: “This decision means that the Met will have to reconsider all use of kettling as a tactic.

“It’s my view that they have used kettling illegally, and sometimes violently, on peaceful demonstrations like the Climate Camp at Bishopsgate, since May 2001.”

Related topics: