No recourse to public funds (NRPF) means that all those on a visa who have not been granted indefinite leave to remain are barred from accessing most forms of state support.
Boris Johnson was questioned about NRPF at the Liaison Committee on May 27, where he appeared never to have heard of the policy and said he would do what he could to help those suffering due to the restrictions during the coronavirus pandemic.
But when Mr Blomfield subsequently questioned Mr Johnson at Prime Minister’s Questions last week, asking for an update on his progress, the Prime Minister appeared to step back from his commitment.
Migrants with NRPF are entitled to access the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and the equivalent for self-employed workers, but are barred from many other forms of state support including Universal Credit, child benefit, and housing benefit.
Mr Blomfield has now written to the PM asking for him to set out “the further action you will take to fulfil your commitment to the Liaison Committee”.
Mr Blomfield said: “Boris Johnson was understandably shocked to learn that people living and working legally in the UK cannot access support when they lose their jobs because of Covid.
“When I asked him about it again at PMQs last week, he still didn’t seem to grasp exactly what the ‘no recourse to public’ funds condition really means. He promised to do all he could to help, and I will make sure he doesn’t forget that commitment.”
It comes after Home Secretary Priti Patel denied that NRPF is a racially discriminate policy.
Facing calls for the policy to be suspended as a step towards tackling inequalities facing people from BAME communities, Ms Patel yesterday said “significant financial provisions” are available for all.
Whilst admitting that members of BAME communities face “many challenges” and that the findings of the recent Public Health England report were “shocking”, Ms Patel refused to suspend the no recourse to public funds policy for the remainder of the pandemic.
The SNP’s home affairs spokesperson Joanna Cherry said: “The Black Lives Matter movement and Public Health England’s Covid-19 outbreak review of disparities in risks and outcomes have highlighted the inequalities suffered by black and minority ethnic people in our society.
“Does the Home Secretary accept that the no recourse to public funds policy disproportionately affects people from BAME communities and if she does, why won’t she push for it to be suspended as a concrete step towards tackling the inequalities which so appal many of our constituents?”
Ms Patel agreed that with regards to the PHE report, “the findings are indeed shocking and it is right that the Government invests its time and resources through the equalities minister in particular to look at the measures that can be brought in place”.
Speaking in the Commons, she said: “Now this policy of no recourse to public funds is one of many policies and it is right as a Government that we look at all policies that affect all communities in the round without singling one particular policy out.”
Ms Cherry added that NRPF is “inherently more likely to affect BAME British children than white British children”.
“So given this evidence that no recourse to public funds is a policy with racially discriminatory impacts, why won’t she accept that it needs to go?”, Ms Cherry said.
Ms Patel replied: “If I may, I think it is wrong to characterise as a policy of racial discrimination.”
She added: “Now I think it is important to recognise that there are a number of issues, there are a plethora of issues that affect people from black, Asian, ethnic minority communities but we cannot assume that there is a one size fits all approach or a single policy solution to address those issues.”
But Lib Dem acting leader Sir Ed Davey said Ms Patel “doesn’t get it”.
“People who work here, paid taxes here for years are being denied support and are falling to destitution,” he said.
Sir Ed added: “So given that this rule disproportionately affects people in our black and minority ethnic communities the hardest, will the Home Secretary now suspend the no recourse to public funds rule for the duration of the pandemic?”
Ms Patel replied: “The answer is no.
“Local authorities have provided a basic safety net and that is through significant financial provisions introduced by the Government and a range of measures to support those people that have been working and because of coronavirus, because of this national health pandemic, the situation we find ourselves in, will support people with no recourse to public funds.
“And that assistance is being given under the Coronavirus Retention Scheme and also the Self-Employed Income Support Scheme. So these funds are available.”
Editor’s note: First and foremost - and rarely have I written down these words with more sincerity - I hope this finds you well.
Almost certainly you are here because you value the quality and the integrity of the journalism produced by The Yorkshire Post’s journalists - almost all of which live alongside you in Yorkshire, spending the wages they earn with Yorkshire businesses - who last year took this title to the industry watchdog’s Most Trusted Newspaper in Britain accolade.
And that is why I must make an urgent request of you: as advertising revenue declines, your support becomes evermore crucial to the maintenance of the journalistic standards expected of The Yorkshire Post. If you can, safely, please buy a paper or take up a subscription. We want to continue to make you proud of Yorkshire’s National Newspaper but we are going to need your help.
Postal subscription copies can be ordered by calling 0330 4030066 or by emailing [email protected] Vouchers, to be exchanged at retail sales outlets - our newsagents need you, too - can be subscribed to by contacting subscriptions on 0330 1235950 or by visiting www.localsubsplus.co.uk where you should select The Yorkshire Post from the list of titles available.
If you want to help right now, download our tablet app from the App / Play Stores. Every contribution you make helps to provide this county with the best regional journalism in the country.
Sincerely. Thank you.